Herramientas de evaluación formativa online para materias de carácter cuantitativo en las titulaciones de Economía y Empresa

  1. García-Bernalt, B. 1
  2. Cascón, J. M. 1
  3. Manrique, A. 1
  4. Andrés, R 1
  5. García, M. D. 1
  6. Santos, G. 1
  1. 1 Dpto Economía e Historia Económica. Univesidad de Salamanca
Zeitschrift:
Anales de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 2171-892X

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Nummer: 29

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Anales de ASEPUMA

Zusammenfassung

In this paper we present an online formative partial assessment model implemented in the academic year 2020-2021 with first year on-site students of the degree in Business Administration and Management (ADE) enrolled in Algebra. We have designed Moodle quizzes with multiple choice (single answer) questions. After a general model theoretical framework, we describe students’ participation and the results obtained. In addition, we propose several Moodle activities that can improve students’ self assessment in other quantitative subjects.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Acosta-Gonzaga, E.; Walet, N. (2017). “The role of attitudinal factors in mathematical on-line assessments: a study of undergraduate STEM students”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), pp. 710–726.
  • Angus, S. D.; Watson, J. (2009). “Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set”. Brit. J. Edu. Technol., 40(2), pp. 255–272.
  • Biggs, J.; Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. What the Student Does. Mc Graw Hill, 4ª ed. (1º ed. 1999).
  • Bloxham, S.; Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill International.
  • Fernandez Enguita, M. ´ (30 de marzo de 2020). Una pandemia imprevisible ha tra´ıdo la brecha previsible. Recuperado de https://blog.enguita.info/2020/03/una-pandemiaimprevisible-ha-traido-la.html
  • Figueroa-Canas, J.; Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2017).“Exploring the Efficacy of Practicing with Wiris-Quizzes in Online Engineering Mathematics”. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnolog´ıas del Aprendizaje, 12(3), pp. 141–146.
  • García Penalvo F.J.; Corell A.; Abella-García V.; Grande M. (2020).“La evoluci´on online en la educaci´on superior en tiempos de la COVID-19”. Education in the Knowledge Society 21.
  • Gaspar Martins, S. (2017). “Weekly online quizzes to a mathematics course for engineering students”. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 36(1), pp. 56–63.
  • Gaspar Martins, S. (2018). “A study of the application of weekly online quizzes in two courses of mathematics for engineering students - is it a fair and effective strategy to increase student learning?”. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(1), pp. 46–59.
  • Grun B, Zeileis A. ¨ (2009). “Automatic Generation of Exams in R”. Journal of Statistical Software, 29(10), 1–14. XXIX Jornadas de ASEPUMA y XVII Encuentro internacional.
  • Hendrickson, A. (2016). “The moodle package: generating Moodle quizzes via Latex”. Recuperado de https://www.ctan.org/pkg/moodle
  • Hendrickson, A.; Guerquin-Kern, M. (2021). “The moodle package: generating Moodle quizzes via LATEX”. Recuperado de https://www.ctan.org/pkg/moodle
  • Huisman, R.; Reedijk H.E. (2012). “The impact of individual online tests in addition to group assignments on student learning”. ICICTE 2012 Proceedings, pp. 654-667.
  • Kleij, F.M. van der; Eggen, T.J.H.M. ; Timmers, C.F.; Veldkamp, B.P. (2012). “Effects of Feedback in a Computer-based Assessment for Learning”. Computers & Education, 58 (1), pp. 263–272.
  • Lawson, D.(2002). “Computer-aided assessment in mathematics: panacea or propaganda”. CAL-laborate, 9, pp. 6-12.
  • Lowe T.W. (2015). “Online quizzes for distance learning of mathematics”. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 34, pp. 138-148.
  • Luo, T.; Murray, A.; Cropton, H. (2017). “Designing Authentic Learning Activities to Train Pre-Service Teachers About Teaching Online”. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), pp. 141-156.
  • Miralles, D.; Canas, M.; Vergara, G. ˜ (2016). “Symbolic computation through Mathematica and Moodle” EDULEARN16 Proceedings, pp. 6701-6711.
  • Nieva Fenoli, J., & Sanch´ıs Crespo, C. (2017). “Modelos de evaluaci´on y plan Bolonia: la evaluaci´on de la docencia a examen”. Direito e Desenvolvimento, 2(3), pp. 73 - 87.
  • Shute, V.J. (2008). “Focus on formative feedback”. Review of Educational Research, 78, pp. 153–189.
  • Stobart, G.(2008). Testing Time: Uses and Abuses of Assessment. Routledge.
  • Vasko, M.; Ritter; Metzger, G. (2018). “Online homework in engineering mathematics: can we narrow the performance gap?” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 8(1), pp. 29–42.
  • Zeileis, A.; Gruen, B.; Leisch, F.; Umlauf, N. (2020). “Automatic Generation of Exams in R. R package version 2.3-6”. Recuperado de: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/exams/index.html
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet