Dudas razonables, sesgos cognitivos y emociones en la argumentación jurídicaEl caso de Doce hombres sin piedad
ISSN: 1576-3935, 1887-505X
Year of publication: 2010
Issue: 5
Pages: 203-214
Type: Article
More publications in: Bajo palabra. Revista de filosofía
Abstract
Concepts as reasonable doubt, cognitive biases and emotions are now a theoretical problem for the practice of law, and the law understood as legal argumentation. From a theoretical point of view, the screenplay written by Reginald Rose, Twelve Angry Men, is an outstanding example to analyze some of these concepts, and its influence on procedural stage. Cognitive biases and informal fallacies are theoretical challenge to legal argumentation.