El uso de los medios de comunicación y la elaboración cognitivaEl papel mediador de la eficacia mediática

Referencias bibliográficas

• Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the “new” news patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180-207.
• Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Hooker, C., and Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Online News Creation, Trust in the Media, and Political Participation: Direct and Moderating Effects over Time. Journalism doi: 10.1177/1464884917700447
• Bachmann, I., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). News platform preference as a predictor of political and civic participation. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 19(4) 496-512. doi: 10.1177/1354856513493699
• Balch, G. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy". Political Methodology, 1-43.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
• Bandura, Albert (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265-299.
• Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19, 73–93.
• Chaffee, S. & Frank, S. (1996). How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546 (July), 48-58.
• Chaffee, S., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76–107.
• Chyi, H. I., & Yang, M. J. (2009). Is online news and inferior good? Examining the economic nature of online news among users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 594-612. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600309
• Eastin, M.S. & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1), 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101. 2000.tb00110.x
• Eveland, W. P., Jr. (1998, August). The cognitive mediation model: A framework for studying learning from the news with survey methods. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD.
• Eveland, W.P., Jr. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and Presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571-601. doi: 10.1177/00936500102800500
• Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 26–40.
• Eveland, W. P., Cortese, J., Park, H., & Dunwoody, S. (2004). How Web site organization influences free recall, factual knowledge, and knowledge structure density. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 208–233.
• Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the web versus print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 34-53.
• Eveland Jr, W. P., Seo, M., & Marton, K. (2002). Learning from the news in campaign 2000: An experimental comparison of TV news, newspapers, and online news. Media Psychology, 4(4), 353-378.
• Eveland, W.P., Jr., Shah, D., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359-386. doi: 10.1177/0093650203253369
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). La función de los vínculos interpersonales ‘débiles y fuertes’ y los atributos de la discusión política como antecedentes de la elaboración cognitiva. REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. 157(1) 65–84. doi: 10.5477/cis/reis.157.65
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., (2015). Toward a European Public Sphere? The Promise and Perils of Modern Democracy in the Age of Digital and Social Media. International Journal of Communication, 9:3152–3160
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T. and Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Internal, External and Government Political Efficacy: Effects on News Use, Discussion, and Political Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 61(3): 574–596 doi: 10.1080/08838151.2017.1344672
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., and Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the ‘News Finds Me’ Perception in Communication Social Media Use Implications for News Seeking and Learning About Politics. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 22(3) 105–123 doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
• Hoogendoorn, A., & Daalmans, J. (2009). Nonresponse in the recruitment of an internet panel based on probability sampling. Survey Research Methods, 3(2), 59-72.
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402
• Jensen, J. D. (2011). Knowledge acquisition following exposure to cancer news articles: A test of the cognitive mediation model. Journal of Communication, 61, 514-534.doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011. 01549.x
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-192.
• Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361–385.
• Lee, S. (2006). An evaluation of nonresponse and coverage errors in a prerecruited probability web panel survey. Social Science Computer Review, 24(4), 460-475.
• McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism studies, 6(4), 543-557.
• McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's mass communication theory. Sage publications.
• Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443-460.
• Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
• Nelson, J. (2015). It’s time to start paying attention to local news. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference: San Juan, PR.
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Pareira, K. L. (2012). Information literacy on the web: How college students use visual and textual clues to assess credibility on health websites. Communications in Information Literacy, 6(1), 34-48.
• Perloff, R. (1998). Political communication: Politics, press and public in America. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 668-672.
• Pingree, R. J. (2011). Effects of unresolved factual disputes in the news on epistemic political efficacy. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 22-47.
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242.
• Robinson, J., & Levy, M. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
• Scheufele, D., A. & Nisbet, M., C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 55-75.
• Schudson, M. (2009). Factual knowledge in the age of truthiness. In, B. Zelizer (Ed.), The changing faces of journalism: Tabloidization, technology and truthiness (pp. 104-113). New York: Routledge.
• Shearer & Gottfried (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/
• Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. (2004). Knowledge as understanding: The information processing approach to political learning. In L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 357–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 343-353.
• Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307-330.
• Vraga, E.K., Edgerly, S., Wang, B.M., & Shah, D. (2011). Who taught me that? Repurposed news, blog structure and source identification. Journal of Communication, 61, 795-815. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011. 01581.x
• Wei, R., & Lo, V. (2008). News media use and knowledge about the 2006 U.S. midterm elections: why exposure matters in voter learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 347-362. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn03
• Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.