Resultado terapéutico de las híbridas termoconformables sobre 4 implantes Top-DM de Bioner. A propósito de un caso.

  1. B. Pardal 1
  2. J. Flores 1
  3. J. Montero 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Cirugía. Universidad de Salamanca.
Revista:
Labor dental clínica: Avances clínicos en odontoestomatología

ISSN: 1888-4040

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 20

Número: 3

Páginas: 18-25

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Labor dental clínica: Avances clínicos en odontoestomatología

Resumen

Introducción. Los implantes dentales constituyen en la actualidad la opción terapéutica para la restauración funcional del edentulismo total. En un hueso mandibular maduro es viable la carga inmediata de los implantes ferulizados protéticamente. Método Este trabajo, muestra la evaluación de un paciente edéntulo inferior tratado con 4 implantes TOP DM (Bioner), los cuales son sometidos a carga inmediata, mediante una prótesis híbrida termoconformable (GT-Medical). Resultados Tras el seguimiento clínico, se analizan distintos parámetros clínicos con el objetivo de evaluar la eficacia del sistema TOP DM en la carga inmediata. Conclusiones Los resultados del presente trabajo indican que la rehabilitación protésica temprana de los implantes TOP DM en mandíbula, son una buena alternativa en pacientes edéntulos, presentando buena osteointegración y éxito clínico.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1. Feine JS, Grandmont P De, Boudrias P, Brien N, Lamarche C, Tache R, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis. 1994;73(5):1105–11.
  • 2. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
  • 3. Schnitman PA, Wohrle PS, Rubenstein JE. Immediate fixed interim prostheses supported by two-stage threaded implants: methodology and results. J Oral Implantol. 1990;16(2):96–105.
  • 4. Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Chuang S-K, Weber H-P. Implant Loading Protocols for Edentulous Patients with Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(suppl):256–270.
  • 5. Esposito M, Mg G, Maghaireh H, Hv W, Esposito M, Grusovin MG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth : different times for loading dental implants (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):1–94.
  • 6. Borges TDF, Mendes A. Mandibular Overdentures with Immediate Loading: Satisfaction and Quality of Life. Int J pr. 2011;24(6):534–9.
  • 7. Feine J, Carlsson G, Awad M, Chehade A, Duncan W, Gizani S, et al. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Gerodontology. 2002;19(1):1–3.
  • 8. Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;(January):71–8.
  • 9. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 Immediate-Function Concept with Brånemark System® Implants for Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A 1-Year Retrospective Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(Suppl 1):S88-s95.
  • 10. Alfadda SA. A randomized controlled clinical trial of edentulous patients treated with immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2018 Nov 10];16(6):806–16. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cid.12057
  • 11. Sato Y, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y, Tenma H. A method for quantifying complete denture quality. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1998 Jul [cited 2019 May 14];80(1):52–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9656178
  • 12. Montero J, Bravo M, Albaladejo A. Validation of two complementary oral-health related quality of life indicators (OIDP and OSS 0-10) in two qualitatively distinct samples of the Spanish population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:1–14.
  • 13. LÖE H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol [Internet]. 1965;610–6. Available from: http://www.belgeler.com/blg/33cm/le-gingival-index-67
  • 14. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. p. 199–210.
  • 15. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. Mosby; 2008.
  • 16. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Lazza A, Casentini P, Ghisolfi M, Iorio M, et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with ITI implants: A comparison of 2-year results between delayed and immediate loading. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2002 Oct [cited 2018 Dec 27];13(5):495–501. Available from: https://www. scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036779585&doi=10.1034%2Fj.1600-0501.2002.130508.x& partnerID=40&md5=821d85352d9b87fe0774137ee0156224
  • 17. García-Moreno S, González-Serrano J, López-Pintor RM, Pardal-Peláez B, Hernández G, Martínez-González JM. Implant stability using piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional drilling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(11):1453–1464.
  • 18. Elsyad MA, Elsaih EA, Khairallah AS. Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator-retained mandibular overdenture. A 1-year randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2014 Aug 1 [cited 2018 Sep 30];41(8):608–18. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/joor.12182
  • 19. Jokstad A, Alkumru H. Immediate function on the day of surgery compared with a delayed implant loading process in the mandible: a randomized clinical trial over 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1325–35.
  • 20. Duello G V. An evidence-based protocol for immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous patient. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2012 Sep 1 [cited 2019 Apr 12];12(3 SUPPL.):172–81. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84867173470&doi=10.1016%2FS1532-3382%2812%2970031-3&partnerID=40&md5=8e6696e413b2413e5ac008e16319931b
  • 21. Perea C, Suárez-García M-J, Del Río J, Torres-Lagares D, Montero J, Castillo-Oyagüe R. Oral health-related quality of life in complete denture wearers depending on their socio-demographic background, prosthetic-related factors and clinical condition. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal [Internet]. 2013;18(3):e371-80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385509%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3668860