Estimación de la memoria en relación al periodo de retención en niños de primariaimplicaciones en el aprendizaje

  1. Salvador Cruz, Judith
  2. Mestas Hernández, Lilia
  3. Gordillo León, Fernando
Journal:
Revista de estilos de aprendizaje = Journal of Learning Styles

ISSN: 2332-8533,  1988-8996

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 7

Issue: 13

Pages: 26-44

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista de estilos de aprendizaje = Journal of Learning Styles

Abstract

Metamemory strategies ha ve very strong implications in social and educational child development. The behavior of 36 children, of ages between 8 and 12 were analyzed in a verbal and metamemory assignment. In the first session distortion of long term metamemory was assessed. In the second session a free memory and recognition verbal memory test was applied. The results show that there is an inverse relation between distortion in a long term metamemory recognition estimation and short term free memory. The children estimated their me mory with independence of the established retention period with regards to their short term memory. It is very important to research the capacity of estimating memory with respect to the period of retention, based on its importance in the optimization of l earning resources in children. As a metamemory strategy, it is very important to know the memory capacity with respect to the period of retention (The capacity of my memory taking into account the time I expect to hold the information), and not only with r egards to retention and information retrieving. This aspect may be an adequate performance measure of the progress in the acquisition of metamemory strategies.

Bibliographic References

  • Referencias
  • Aguilera, A. B. (2010). Desarrollo de la memoria. Revista Digital Enfoques Educativos, 65, 4-16.
  • Amiri, B. M. y Ghiassi, S. (2012). The Impact of Teaching Procedural Metamemory Strategies on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprensión. Journal or Languaje and Translation, 3, 51-60.
  • Benedet, M. J., Alejandre, M. A. y Pamos, A. (2001). Test de Aprendizaje Verbal España-Complutense infantil: manual. TEA Ediciones.
  • Berk, L.E. (1999). Desarrollo del niño y adolescente. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Borkowsky, J. G. y Cavanaugh, J. C. (1981). Metacognition and intelligence theory. En Friedman, M. et al. (eds.): Intelligence And learning. Nueva Cork, Plenum.
  • Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J. y Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). mmature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children: Evidence from Fmri. Neuron, 33, 301-311.
  • Dixon, R. A. (1989). Questionnaire research on metamemory and aging: Issues of structure and function. En L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubbin, and B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 394-415). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287.
  • Efklides, A. (2009). The role of metacognitive experiences in the learning process. Psicothema, 21, 76-82.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
  • Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367,1338-49.
  • Introzzi, I., Canet, L. y Andrés, M. L. (2010). Desarrollo de estrategias de memoria en niños de 5 a 8 años de edad. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 27, 117-125.
  • Janowsky, J. S., Shimamura, A. P. y Squire, L. R., (1989). Memory and metamemory: Comparasion between patients with frontal lobe lesion and amnesic patients. Psychobiology, 17, 3-11.
  • Kalably, K. y Zabrucky, K. M. (2009). Children's metamemory: A review of the literature and implications for the classroom. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2, 32-52.
  • López, J. y Meza, R. (1993). Léxico disponible de preescolares mexicanos. México: UNAM. Alhambra Mexicana.
  • Miner, A. C. y Reder, L. M. (1994). A new look at feeling of knowing: Its metacognitive role in regulating question answering. En J. Metcalfe y A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition. Konowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Modirrousta, M. y Fellows, L. K. (2008). Medial prefrontal cortex plays a critical and selective role in ‘feeling of knowing’ meta-memory judgments. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2958-2965.
  • Palacios, J. Marchesi, A. y Coll, C. (2008). Desarrollo psicológico y educación. Alianza editorial. Madrid.
  • Panu, J. K. y Kaszniak, A. W. (2005). Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: A Review. Neuropsychology Review, 15, 105-130.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. En Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidener, M. (Eds.) Handbook of self regulation. (pp.452-502). New York: Academia Press.
  • Ruiz, M. (2008). Las caras de la memoria. Madrid: Pearson Educación, S. A.
  • Salvador, J. y Galindo, G. (1996). Cuestionario de antecedentes neurológicos y psiquiátricos. En V. Galindo, S. Cortés & J. Salvador. Diseño de un nuevo procedimiento para calificar la Prueba de la Figura Compleja de Rey: confiabilidad inter-evaluadores. Salud Mental, 19, 1-6.
  • Salvador, J. y Salgado, J. (2012) Memoria verbal en niños de 4 a 6 años de edad y su relación con el desarrollo de habilidades escolares. EduPsykhé, 11, 3-19.
  • Schraw, G. (1995). Measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy: A new look at an old problem. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 321-332.
  • Sierra-Fitzgerald, O. (2010). Memoria y metamemoria: relaciones funcionales y estabilidad de las mismas. Universitas Psicológica, 9, 213-227.
  • Vallés, A. (2002). El aprendizaje de estrategias metaatencionales y de metamemoria. Algunas propuestas y ejemplificaciones para el aula. Educar en el 2000, 5, 20-25.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. En Boekaerts, M; Pintrich, P. y Zeidner, M. (Ed.) Handbook of self regulation. (pp. 13-39). New York: Academia Press.
Data source: Dialnet