Nuevas fronteras en el espacio económico. Economía social y economías alternativas

  1. Pallares-Barbera, Montserrat 1
  2. Sánchez-Hernández, José Luis 2
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Documents d'anàlisi geogràfica

ISSN: 0212-1573,  2014-4512

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Reflexionant sobre els reptes de futur des de la Geografia

Volume: 68

Issue: 3

Pages: 505-518

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/DAG.745 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Documents d'anàlisi geogràfica

Related Projects

GOBERNANZA URBANO-RURAL Y TRANSICIÓN ALIMENTARIA EN REGIONES DE BAJA DENSIDAD: CASTILLA Y LEÓN

2021/00310/001

Abstract

Based on the format of the work of Andrew Barry and Mark Maslin, this article aims to reflect on the capacity of the social economy and alternative economies to generate collective impacts on the territory in the second decade of the twenty-first century. Analytical reflection is based on various theories of the emergence of new forms of economic activity and their relationship with the territory, and assumes that territorial conditions are always unequal, as has been documented in economic geography. Therefore, from path dependence and the theory of the sociotechnical transition new questions are discussed and formulated on the strong links of the social and territorial components of both concepts. The idea that past decisions condition the decisions we can make today and that current or future states, actions, or decisions depend on the path that previous events have taken is postulated as a critical explanation of the formation of different solutions and economic spaces. Socio-technical transition as a conceptual tool is proposed for understanding the process of transition (ecological, energy, food, among others) to a sustainable economic and social model.

Bibliographic References

  • BARRY, Andrew y MASLIN, Mark (2016). «The Politics of the Anthropocene: a Dialogue». Geo. Geography and Environment, 3 (2), 1-12.
  • BEDNAR, Jenna y PAGE, Scott (2005). «A Model of Institutional Path Dependence». Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C.
  • BEDNAR, Jenna; JONES-ROOY, Andrea y PAGE, Scott E. (2015). «Choosing a future based on the past: Institutions, behavior, and path dependence». European Journal of Political Economy, 40, 312-332.
  • BOLETÍN OFICIAL DEL ESTADO (2011). Ley 5/2011, de 29 de marzo, de Economía Social. BOE núm. 76, de 30 de marzo de 2011.
  • BOSCHMA, Ron A. y LAMBOOY, Jan G. (1999). «Evolutionary economics and economic geography». Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 411-429.
  • BOSCHMA, Ron A. y FRENKEN, Koep (2006). «Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science?» Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273-302.
  • CASTELLS, Manuel (1983). The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley y Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • CHAVES, Rafael y MONZÓN, José Luis (2018). «La economía social ante los paradigmas económicos emergentes: innovación social, economía colaborativa, economía circular, responsabilidad social empresarial, economía del bien común, empresa social y economía solidaria». CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 93, 5-50.
  • DAVID, Paul (1985). «Clio and the Economics of QWERTY». American Economic Review, 75 (2), 332-337.
  • DEFOURNY, Jacques y DEVELTERE, Patrick (1999). «The social economy: The worldwide making of a third sector». En: DEFOURNY, J.; DEVELTERE, P. y FONTENEAU, B. (eds.). L’économie sociale au Nord et au Sud. Bruselas: De Boeck Université, 1-35.
  • DOT, Esteve y PALLARES‐BARBERA, Montserrat (2017). «La reactivación económica del entorno de Can Batlló (Barcelona) a partir de la economía social». En: Naturaleza, territorio y ciudad en un mundo global. Actas del XXV Congreso de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles. Madrid: Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles y Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 1.035‐1.044.
  • ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY (2011). «Editorial: Emerging Themes in Economic Geography: Outcomes of the Economic Geography 2010 Workshop». Economic Geography, 87 (2), 111-126.
  • GEELS, Frank W. (2002). «Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study». Research Policy, 31, 1.257-1.274.
  • GHEZZI, Simone y MINGIONE, Enzo (2007). «Embeddedness, path dependency and social institutions: An economic sociology approach». Current Sociology, 55 (1), 11-23.
  • GIBSON-GRAHAM, Julie-Katharine (2014). «Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory». Current Anthropology, 55 (9), S147-S153.
  • GRABHER, Gernot (1993). «The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr Area». En: GRABHER, Gernot (ed.). The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. Londres, Nueva York: Routledge: 255-277.
  • HARVEY, David (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • KRLEV, Gorgi; PASI, Giulio; WRUK, Dominika y BERNHARD, Marika (2021). «Reconceptualizing the Social Economy». Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://doi.org/10.48558/98VT-G859
  • MARKUSEN, Ann R. (1987). Regions: the economics and politics of territory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.
  • MARTIN, Ron (2010). «Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography – Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution». Economic Geography, 86 (1), 1-27.
  • NELSON, Richard R. y WINTER, Sidney G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.
  • OCDE (2007). The Social Economy: Building Inclusive Economies. OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Programme. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/fr/cfe/leed/thesocialeconomybuildinginclusiveeconomies.htm
  • PAGE, Scott E. (2006). «Path Dependence». Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87-115.
  • PECK, Jamie (2005). «Economic sociologies in space». Economic Geography, 81 (2), 129-175.
  • PIKE, Andy; RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, Andrés y TOMANEY, John (2007). «What kind of local and regional development and for whom?». Regional Studies, 41 (9), 1.253-1.269.
  • RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, Andrés (2013). «Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?». Regional Studies, 47 (7), 1.034-1.047.
  • SÁNCHEZ HERNÁNDEZ, José Luis (2017). Las prácticas económicas alternativas en perspectiva geográfica. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
  • SÁNCHEZ HERNÁNDEZ, José Luis (coord.) (2019). Espacios y prácticas económicas alternativas en las ciudades españolas. Cizur Menor (Navarra): Thomson-Reuters-Aranzadi.
  • TULLA, Antoni F.; GUIRADO, Carles; BADIA, Anna; VERA, Ana; VALLDEPERAS, Natàlia y EVARD, Camille (2015). «L’agricultura social a Catalunya. Una doble alternativa: desenvolupament local i ocupació de col·lectius en risc d’exclusió social». Quaderns Agraris, 38, 23-49.
Data source: Dialnet