Causation and the agent's point of view

  1. Álvarez Toledo, Sebastián
Revista:
Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

ISSN: 0495-4548

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 29

Número: 79

Páginas: 133-147

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

Resumen

Hay filósofos que niegan la existencia de relaciones causales en la naturaleza argumentando que no son sino producto de nuestra perspectiva como seres capaces de acciones intencionales. En este artículo expongo brevemente esta tesis y sostengo que debe contar con el complemento de una ontología no causal básica que dé razón de los fenómenos que se consideran causales. Luego describo lo que parece ser una buena candidata para tal ontología y concluyo que, sin embargo, ésta no puede prescindir del concepto de causalidad y que, por tanto, no es el tipo de ontología que necesita la mencionada tesis antirrealista respecto a la causalidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aronson, J. 1971. On the Grammar of 'Cause'. Synthese 22: 414-430.
  • Bird, A. 2007. Nature's Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Boyd, R. 1991. Realism, Anti-Fundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds. Philosophical Studies 61: 127-148
  • Boyd, R. 1999. Kinds, Complexity and Multiple Realization. Philosophical Studies 65: 67-98.
  • Bunge, M. 1959. Causality. The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clanrendon Press
  • Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Collingwood, R. 1940. An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • García Encinas, M. J. 2011. "Singular Causation without Dispositions,". Theoria 70, 35-50.
  • Gasking, D. 1955. Causation and Recipes. Mind 64: 479-487.
  • Glennan, S. 1996. Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation. Erkenntnis 44: 49-71.
  • Glennan, S. 2002. Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 69: S342-S353.
  • Hausman, D. 1998. Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Mach, E. 1883. Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargestellt. Leibzig: Brockhaus. English translation: The Science of Mechanics. La Salle: Open Court, 1960.
  • Mackie, J. L. 1980. The Cement of Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Menzies, P. and H. Price. 1993. Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 187-203.
  • Mumford, S. and R. L. Anjum. 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pearl, J. 2000. Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Price, H. 1992. Agency and Causal Asymmetry. Mind 101 (403):501-520.
  • Price, H. 1996. Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Price, H. 2007. Causal perspectivalism. In Causation, Physics and the Constitution of Reality, edited by H. Price and R. Corry, 250-292. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Russell, B. 1913. On the Notion of Cause. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1-26.
  • Salmon, W. C. 1993. Causality: Production and Propagation. In Causation, edited by E. Sosa and M. Tooley, 154-171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spirtes, P., C. Glymour and R. Scheines. 1993. Causation, Predition and Search. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Vicente, A. 2004. The role of dispositions in explanation. Theoria 51: 301-310.
  • Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Woodward, J. 2007. Causation with a Human Face. In Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality, edited by H. Price and R. Corry, 66-105. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Wright, G. von. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, N. Y: Cornell University Press.