Una aproximación cualitativa a las publicaciones científicas en Humanidades: el punto de vista de los investigadores

  1. Guillén-Chávez, Evelyn-Paola
  2. Núñez-Pacheco, Rosa
  3. Barreda-Parra, Aymé
  4. Cabanillas-García, Juan Luis
  5. Sánchez-Gómez, Mª Cruz 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
New Trends in Qualitative Research

ISSN: 2184-7770

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 14

Type: Article

DOI: 10.36367/NTQR.14.2022.E579 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: New Trends in Qualitative Research

Abstract

Research in the Humanities is a field that has been gaining relevance in recent years. However, their production and impact levels arestill low. In this sense, this article aims to analyze three categories that correspond to the motivations and competencies of the researcher in Humanities, the strategies for promoting research and publication in the Humanities, and the impact of publications in this area of knowledge. The qualitative approach was used through content analysis. A non-probabilistic sampling of international Humanities expert researchers was carried out. In this study participated seventeen professors from 13 institutions of higher-level education. The webQDA software was used for data analysis. The main results concerning the motivations show that the most relevant for the respondents are disseminating their research (20,59%). Regarding the competencies of the researcher, 33,33% indicated that they do possess these competencies and have a genuine interest in their object of study. Concerning the promotion of research, 30% highlighted that the university offers monetary incentives for publication and different seedbeds to encourage its academics' research. About the impact of the publications, 24% of the researchers pointed out that the natural sciences imposethe criteria; and, finally, 76,47% indicated that the H index or the number of citations of a scientific article is not appropriate to assess the impact in the area of the Humanities. In conclusion, these results suggest that Humanities researchers need their scientific and academic production to be evaluated using criteria different from those generally used in science and technologyaccording to the characteristics and nature of their field of study