Legisladores y aborto en América Latinaentendiendo la tríada género, religión e ideología

  1. Márquez Romo, Cristian 1
  2. Montaño Reyes, Mónica 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidad de Guadalajara
    info

    Universidad de Guadalajara

    Guadalajara, México

    ROR https://ror.org/043xj7k26

Zeitschrift:
América latina hoy: Revista de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1130-2887

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 92

Seiten: 95-116

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14201/ALH.28439 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: América latina hoy: Revista de ciencias sociales

Zusammenfassung

Gender is key to predict individuals’ positions toward abortion, but we know little about how it interacts with their ideological preferences and religious beliefs. The article analyzes whether ideology and religious beliefs moderate the effect of gender on legislators’ positions toward abortion, using comparative survey data from almost 8.000 members of Latin American parliaments in 18 countries between 1994 and 2018.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Adams, G. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718-737. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111673
  • Alcántara, M. y Rivas, C. (2013). Opinión sobre el aborto desde la perspectiva de los legisladores latinoamericanos. Boletín Elites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas, 54, 1-6. https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/122580/boletin_elites_54_2013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Alcántara, M. (2022). Proyecto Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA-USAL). Universidad de Salamanca (1994-2021). https://oir.org.es/pela/
  • Alcántara, M. y Rivas, C. (2018, 18 de junio). Despenalización del aborto en América Latina: proceloso camino. Estudios de Política Exterior. https://www.politicaexterior.com/despenalizacion-del-aborto-america-latina-proceloso-camino/
  • Alvarez, R. M. y Brehm, J. (1995). American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 1055-1082. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111669
  • Arana, I. (2018). Comparative political elites. En A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1-8). Springer International Publishing.
  • Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C., Mathiasen, A., y Petersen, N. (2019). The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1117-1140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000084
  • Barragán, M., Bohigues, A. y Rivas, C. (2020). Élites parlamentarias de América Latina. ¿Cómo ha evolucionado el perfil de la representación? Revista Española de Sociología, 29(3), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.38
  • Berkman, M. B. y O’Connor, R. E. (1993). Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy. American Politics Quarterly, 21(1), 102-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100107
  • Bohigues, A., Guedes-Neto, J. V. y Santos, M. L. (2022). Latin American political elites’ positions on same-sex marriage, abortion, and drug legalization. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 114, 1-24. http://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10833
  • Boidi, M. F. y Corral, M. (2013). Public opinion and abortion rights in the Americas. AmericasBarometer Topical Brief, 8, 1-3. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/ITB008en.pdf
  • Bolzendahl, C. I. y Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759-789. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0005
  • Brown, J. L. (2008). La cuestión del aborto en Argentina. Una mirada a partir de la prensa periódica (1). Question/Cuestión, 1(20). https://perio.unlp.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/question/article/view/688
  • Davis, N. J. y Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095674
  • Fairbanks, D. (1977). Religious Forces and «Morality» Policies in the American States. Western Political Quarterly, 30(3), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/447941
  • Fairbrother, M. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.24
  • Franceschet, S. (2003). State feminism’ and women’s movements: The impact of Chile’s Servicio nacional de la mujer on women’s activism. Latin American Research Review, 38(1), 9-40. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2003.0006
  • Gormley, W. T. (1986). Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System. Polity, 18(4), 595-620. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234884
  • Hoffmann-Langue, U. (2007). Methods of Elite Research. En R. J. Dalton y H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 910-928). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0049
  • Jennings, M. K. y Farah, B. G. (1981). Social Roles and Political Resources: An Over-Time Study of Men and Women in Party Elites. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 462-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110814
  • Márquez Romo, C. y Romero-Vidal, X. (2022). El giro a la izquierda y las fuerzas armadas: convergencia y polarización ideológica en América Latina. Revista Española de Sociología, 31(2), a104. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2022.104
  • Medoff, M. H. y Dennis, C. (2011). Public Preferences, Political Party Control, and Restrictive State Abortion Laws. American Review of Politics, 30(31), 307-331. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2010.31.0.307-331
  • Mooney, C. Z. y Lee, M. H. (1995). Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 599-627. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111646
  • Morgan, D. R. y Meier, K. J. (1980). Politics and Morality: The Effect of Religion on Referenda Voting. Social Science Quarterly, 61(1), 144-148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42860679
  • Norrander, B. y Wilcox, C. (1999). Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-Roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.x
  • Pribble, J. (2006). Women and welfare: The politics of coping with new social risks in Chile and Uruguay. Latin American Research Review, 41(2), 84-111. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2006.0028
  • Rodríguez, C. y Rubio-Padilla, S. (2019). Las mujeres parlamentarias y el consenso de las materias primas en América Latina. En F. Sánchez y M. García-Montero (coords.), Los ciclos políticos y económicos de América Latina y el boom de las materias primas. Tecnos.
  • Santos, C. M. (2004). En-gendering the police: Women’s Police stations and feminism in São Paulo. Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0059
  • Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., Verba, S. y Donahue, J. (1995). Gender and citizen participation: Is there a different voice? American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111613
  • Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y. y Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1
  • Taylor-Robinson, M. y Heath, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women & Politics, 24(4), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v24n04_04
  • Tuman, J. P., Roth-Johnson, D. y Jelen, T. (2013). Conscience and Context: Attitudes Toward Abortion in Mexico. Social Science Quarterly, 94(1), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00905.x
  • Viterna, J. (2012). The left and ‘life’ in El Salvador. Politics & Gender, 8(2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X12000244
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet