La información sobre diversidad e inclusión en las empresas europeas: evolución y características

  1. Isabel María García-Sánchez 1
  2. Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán 2
  3. Cristina Aibar-Guzmán 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación. CEF

ISSN: 2695-6896,  2792-8306

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 485-486

Páginas: 139-172

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.51302/RCYT.2023.16811 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación. CEF

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es el análisis de la divulgación de información sobre diversidad e inclusión en los estados de información no financiera o de sostenibilidad para una muestra de empresas europeas con el objetivo de determinar las estrategias divulgativas de las compañías en relación con la materialidad de la información divulgada, medida por su relevancia, normalización, integridad y fiabilidad. Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto que la divulgación de información sobre diversidad e inclusión ha tenido una evolución positiva a lo largo del periodo analizado (2011-2020), al igual que la normalización, la fiabilidad y la integridad. También ha aumentado de forma importante la relevancia de la información divulgada. En todos los casos, el incremento es más significativo a partir de 2017, coincidiendo con la publicación de las Directrices sobre la presentación de informes no financieros (2017/C 215/01), lo que denota la influencia positiva que estas guías han tenido en el impacto de la Directiva de información no financiera (2014/95/UE) en la utilidad de la información empresarial en materia de sostenibilidad. La evidencia obtenida es de utilidad práctica tanto para las empresas como para los reguladores y otras organizaciones de cara a conocer el cumplimiento por parte de las grandes compañías europeas de las diferentes normativas en materia de diversidad e inclusión, así como su posición frente a la estrategia de igualdad de género impulsada por la Comisión Europea y las metas establecidas en el Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible 5 de la Agenda 2030.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barberá, E., Ramos, A., Sarrió, M. y Candela, C. (2002). Más allá del techo de cristal. Diversidad de género, 40, 55-68.
  • Baumüller, J. y Sopp, K. (2022). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0114
  • Ben-Amar, W., Bujaki, M., McConomy, B. y McIlkenny, P. (2022). Disclosure transparency and impression management: A textual analysis of board gender diversity disclosures in Canada. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1.247-1.265. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2267
  • Boiral, O. y Henri, J. F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society, 56(2), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576134
  • Brooks, C. y Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005
  • Campbell, K. y Helleloid, D. (2023). Ann Hopkins and PwC: Critically Analyzing Culture, Leadership, Policies, and Reporting for Diversity and Inclusion. Issues in Accounting Education, 38(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2021-115
  • Catalyst (2021). Quick Take: Women on Corporate Boards.
  • Catalyst (2022a). Women CEOs of the S&P 500.
  • Catalyst (2022b). Quick Take: Women in Management.
  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D. y Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
  • Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G. y Tsang, A. (2019). Causes and consequences of voluntary assurance of CSR reports: International evidence involving Dow Jones Sustainability Index Inclusion and Firm Valuation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2.451-2.474. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3424
  • Credit Suisse Research Institute (2022). The CS Gender 3000 in 2021: Broadening the diversity discussion. https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/csri-2021-gender-3000.pdf
  • Cubilla-Montilla, M., Nieto-Librero, A. B., Galindo-Villardón, M. P., Vicente Galindo, M. P. y García-Sánchez, I. M. (2019). Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,26, 938-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1733
  • Czymara, C. S., Langenkamp, A. y Cano, T. (2021). Cause for concerns: gender inequality in experiencing the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. European Societies,23(sup. 1), S68-S81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1808692
  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A. y Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
  • Dienes, D., Sassen, R. y Fischer, J. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014-0050
  • Erkens, M., Paugam, L. y Stolowy, H. (2015). Non-financial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 21(3), 15-92.
  • European Commission (EC). (2020). Sum-mary report of the public consultation on the review of the non-financial reporting directive. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=PI_COM:Ares(2020)3997889&from=EN
  • Fisher, A. N. y Ryan, M. K. (2021). Gender inequalities during COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 237-245.
  • Furlotti, K., Mazza, T., Tibiletti, V. y Triani, S. (2019). Women in top positions on boards of directors: Gender policies disclosed in Italian sustainability reporting. Corpo-rate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1657
  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Harvard Business School Press.
  • García-Sánchez, I. M. (2021). Corporate social reporting and assurance: The state of the art: Información social corporativa y asegura-miento: El estado de la cuestión. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 24(2), 241-269. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.409441
  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Oliveira, M. C. y Mar-tínez-Ferrero, J. (2020). Female directors and gender issues reporting: The impact of stakeholder engagement at country level. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27. 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1811
  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Minutiello, V. y Tetta-manzi, P. (2022a). Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm’s equality policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2207
  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Sierra-García, L. y García-Benau, M. A. (2022b). How does the EU non-financial directive affect the assurance market? Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31, 823-845. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12428
  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Raimo, N., Uribe-Bohorquez, M. V. y Vitolla, F. (2022c). Corporate reputation and stakeholder engagement: Do assurance quality and assurer attributes matter? International Journal of Auditing, 26(3), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12287
  • Grosser, K. y Moon, J. (2008). Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality?: A corporate social responsibility perspective. Accounting Forum, 32(3), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.01.004
  • Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N. y Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian accounting review, 19(3), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2009.00056.x
  • Holton, V. y Dent, F. E. (2016). A better career environment for women: developing a blueprint for individuals and organisations. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(8), 542-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-08-2015-0074
  • Hossain, D., Ahmad, N. N. y Siraj, S. A. (2016). Marxist Feminist Perspective of Corpo-rate Gender Disclosures. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 7, 11-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2016-07-02
  • Houser, K. A. (2019). Can AI solve the diversity problem in the tech industry: Mitigating noise and bias in employment decisionmaking. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22(1), 290-353.
  • Kikuchi, S., Kitao, S. y Mikoshiba, M. (2021). Who suffers from the COVID-19 shocks? Labor market heterogeneity and welfare consequences in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2020.101117
  • Klinger, U. y Svensson, J. (2021). The power of code: women and the making of the dig-ital world. Information, Communication & Society, 24(14), 2.075-2.090. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962947
  • Maj, J. (2018). Embedding diversity in sustainability reporting. Sustainability, 10(7), 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072487
  • Martínez-Ferrero, J. y García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Sustainability assurance and cost of capital: Does assurance impact on credibility of corporate social responsibility information? Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12152
  • Mio, C. (2010). Corporate social reporting in Italian multiutility companies: An cal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Environmental Management, 17(5), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.213
  • Monteiro, A. P., Aibar-Guzmán, B., Garrido--Ruso, M. y Aibar-Guzmán, C. (2021). Employee-related disclosure: A bibliomet-ric review. Sustainability, 13(10), 5.342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105342
  • Monteiro, A. P., García-Sánchez, I. M. y Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2022). Labour Practice, Decent Work and Human Rights Performance and Reporting: The Impact of Women Managers. Journal of Bussines Ethics, 180, 523-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04913-1
  • Muslu, V., Mutlu, S., Radhakrishnan, S. y Tsang, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility report narratives and analyst forecast accuracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1.119-1.142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3429-7
  • Ngalawa, H. y Derera, E. (2020). Agricultural Production, Employment and Gender Vulnerability: COVID-19 Implications. African Journal of Governance & Development, 9(1.1), 200-225.
  • Nicolò, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G. y De Iorio, S. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance and non-financial disclosure in Europe: does the gender diversity matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0100
  • Oliveira, M., Rodrigues Júnior, M. S., Lima, S. H. O. y Freitas, G. A. (2018). The influence of the characteristics of the National Business System in the disclosure of gender-related Corporate Social Responsibility practices. Administrative Science, 8(14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020014
  • Ottenstein, P., Erben, S., Jost, S., Weuster, C.W. y Zülch, H. (2022). From voluntarism to regulation: effects of directive 2014/95/EUon sustainability reporting in the EU. Jour-nal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 55-98, https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2021-0075
  • Pande, R. y Ford, D. (2012). Gender Quotas and Female Leadership. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9120
  • Parsa, S., Roper, I., Muller-Camen, M. y Szigetvari, E. (2018). Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 47-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.001
  • Perugini, M. L. L. (2009). Nuevas metáforas acerca de las mujeres líderes. Psicodebate. Psicología, Cultura y Sociedad, 9, 65-80.
  • Sarrió, M., Barberá, E., Ramos, A. y Candela, C. (2002). Glass ceiling in the professional pro-motion of women. International Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347402320007582
  • Scarborough, W. J., Lambouths III, D. L. y Holbrook, A. L. (2019). Support of work-place diversity policies: The role of race, gender, and beliefs about inequality. Social Science Research, 79, 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.002
  • Searcy, C., Dixon, S. M. y Neumann, W. P. (2016). The use of work environment performance indicators in corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2.907-2.921, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.081
  • Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F. y Demir, M. (2017). Enhancing the role and effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The missing element of content verification and integrity assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2862-3
  • Shimeld, S., Williams, B. y Shimeld, J. (2017). Diversity ASX corporate governance rec-ommendations: a step towards change? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2016-0089
  • Siboni, B., Sangiorgi, D., Farneti, F. y De Vil-liers, C. (2016). Gender (in) accounting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2016-0054
  • Singh, V., Point, S. y Moulin, Y. (2015). French supervisory board gender composition and quota threat: Changes from 2008 to 2010. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(7), 551-571. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2015-0065
  • Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). (2020). SASB Human Capital Bulletin. https://www.sasb.org/knowledge-hub/sasb-human-capital-bulletin/
  • United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) y Pacto Mundial. (2011). Principios rectores sobre las empresas y los derechos humanos: puesta en práctica del marco «Proteger, res-petar y remediar» de las Naciones Unidas. https://www.pactomundial.org/biblioteca/principios-rectores-sobre-las-empresas-y-los-derechos-humanos-puesta-en-prac-tica-del-marco-de-las-naciones-unidas-para-proteger-respetar-y-remediar/
  • United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) y UN Women. (2012). WEPs Transparency and Accountability Framework Creating Transparency on Gender Equality to Transform Business. https://www.weps.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/WEPs%20Trans-parency%20and%20Accountability%20Framework%20FINAL.pdf
  • Venturelli, A., Fasan, M. y Pizzi, S. (2022). Guest editorial Rethinking non-financial reporting in Europe: challenges and opportunities in revising Directive 2014/95/EU. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-02-2022-265
  • World Economic Forum (2022). Global Gender Gap Report 2022. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2022.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet