Innovación tecnológica en Españaun análisis basado en patentes de la Oficina de Patentes y Marcas de Estados Unidos (1976 - 2019)

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Martínez, M. A. (2018). Does technological diversification spur university patenting? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 96-119. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10961-015-9414-y
• Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811167
• Alexy, O., George, G., & Salter, A. J. (2013). Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 270–291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23416445
• Almodóvar, P. (2011). The home‐region orientation of Spanish exporting firms, Multinational Business Review, 19(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/15253831111172649
• Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy, 34(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002
• Archibugi, D., Denni, M., & Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological capabilities of nations: the state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.002
• Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361–379. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2098345
• Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
• Athreye, S. S., Fassio, C., & Roper, S. (2021). Small firms and patenting revisited. Small Business Economics, 57, 513–530. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-020-00323-1
• Audretsch, D. B., Coad, A., & Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small Business Economics, 43, 743–749. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-014-9560-x
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 77(1) 99–120. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014920639101700108
• Beneito, P., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., & Sanchis, A. (2018). International patenting decisions: empirical evidence with Spanish firms. Economía Política, 35, 579–599. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40888-018-0105-7
• Blind, K., Cremers, K., & Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies' patent portfolios, Research Policy, 38(2), 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.003
• Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany, Research Policy, 35, 655-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002
• Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2017). The relation between R&D spending and patents: The moderating effect of collaboration networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 46, 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.001
• Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalisation on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0039
• Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent. An application of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00003-7
• Candelin-Palmqvist, H., Sandberg, B., & Mylly, U. M. (2012). Intellectual property rights in innovation management research: a review. Technovation, 32(9-10), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.005
• Castellani, D., & Pieri, F. (2013). R&D offshoring and the productivity growth of European regions. Research Policy, 42(9), 1581–1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.009
• Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation, 55–56, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.04.003
• Ceccagnoli, M. (2009). Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management, 30(1), 81–98. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.723
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 127, 35–41. https://www.proquest.com/docview/224970683
• Comisión Europea. (2021). European Innovation Scoreboard 2021 (IUSB); Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard_en
• Comisión Europea. (2022). Commission Staff Working Document. Country Report Spain 2022; European Commission: Brussels. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022-05/2022-european-semester-country-report-spain_en.pdf
• Conner, K., & Prahalad, C. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization. Science, 7(5), 77–501. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.7.5.477
• Deeds, D. L. (2001). The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00032-1
• Dosi, G., & Nelson, R.R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3), 153–172. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01236366
• FECYT (2019). Indicadores del Sistema Español de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Edición 2019. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Madrid. https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/indicadores-del-sistema-espanol-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-2019
• Fonseca, L., & Nieth, L. (2021). The role of universities in regional development strategies: A comparison across actors and policy stages. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(3), 298-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776421999743
• Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Technological Structures and Performance Reflected by Patent Indicators. In: Schmoch, U. Rammer, C. Legler, H. (eds.): National Systems of Innovation in Comparison. Structure and Performance Indicators for Knowledge Societies. Dordrecht: Springer. https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=BVkQ64K2A4kC
• Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2010). Transnational patents and international markets, Scientometrics, 82, 185-200. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-009-0082-2
• Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among 'follower' countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33(9), 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.006
• Galende, J. (2008). La organización del proceso de innovación en la empresa española. Economía Industrial. 368, 169–185. https://www.mincotur.gob.es/Publicaciones/Publicacionesperiodicas/EconomiaIndustrial/RevistaEconomiaIndustrial/368/169.pdf
• García-Pozo, A., Campos-Soria, J. A., & Núñez-Carrasco, J. A. (2021). Technological innovation and productivity across Spanish regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 67, 167–187. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00168-020-01044-9
• González-Álvarez, N., & Nieto-Antolín, M. (2007). Appropriability of innovation results: an empirical study in Spanish manufacturing firms. Technovation, 27(5), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.004
• Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., & Sjöberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multi‐technology corporations. R&D Management, 22(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00801.x
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic
• Literature, XXVIII: 1661-1707. https://www.nber.org/papers/w3301
• Gumbau, M., & Maudos, J. (2006). Technological activity and economic growth in the Spanish regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 40, 55–80. https://www.uv.es/maudosj/publicaciones/annals.pdf
• Gumbau-Albert, M., & Maudos, J. (2009). Patents, technological inputs and spillovers among regions, Applied Economics, 41(12), 1473 — 1486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601032250
• Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
• Hasan, I., & Tucci, C. L. (2010). The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence. Research Policy, 39(10), 1264–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.005
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, & A. Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations, Science, 317(5837), 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
• Holgersson, M. (2013). Patent management in entrepreneurial SMEs: a literature review and an empirical study of innovation appropriation, patent propensity, and motives. R&D Management, 43(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00700.x
• Holgersson, M., & Granstrand, O. (2017). Patenting motives, technology strategies, and open innovation. Management Decision, 55(6), 1265-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2016-0233
• Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 235 - 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00046-9
• Izsak, K., Markianidou, P., Lukach, R., & Wastyn, A. (2013). The impact of the crisis on research and innovation policies, European Commission, Brussels. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/support-policy-making/support-national-research-and-innovation-policy-making/research-and-innovation-paper-series_en
• Klette, T. J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Empirical patterns of firm growth and R&D investment: A quality ladder model interpretation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 363–387. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2566239
• Krammer, S. M. S., Strange, R., & Lashitew, A. (2018). The export performance of emerging economy firms: the influence of firm capabilities and institutional environments. International Business Review, 27(1), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.07.003
• Lach, S. (1995). Patents and productivity growth at the industry level: A first look. Economics Letters, 49(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00618-C
• Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441–465. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3590103
• Laplume, A. O., Pathak, S., & Xavier-Oliveira, E. (2014). The politics of intellectual property rights regimes: An empirical study of new technology use in entrepreneurship. Technovation, 34(12), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.006
• Lawson, C. (2013). Academic patenting: The importance of industry support. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 509–35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10961-012-9266-7
• Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 615–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.181
• Lee, V., Leong, L., Hew, T., & Ooi, K. (2013). Knowledge management: a key determinant in advancing technological innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 848-872. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2013-0315
• Liu, W., Tan, R., Li, Z., Cao, G., & Yu, F. (2020). A patent-based method for monitoring the development of technological innovations based on knowledge diffusion, Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 380-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2019-0502
• Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study, Management Science, 32(2), 173-181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2631551
• Maskus, K. E., & Penubarti, M. (1995). How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics, 39(3-4), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8
• McEvily, S., Eisenhardt, K., & Prescott, J. (2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management, 25, 713–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.425
• Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2013). Knowing when to leap: transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management, 35(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2097
• Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
• Narula, R. (2002). Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research Policy, 31(5), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00148-2
• Nonaka, I., & Krogh, G. v. (2009). Perspective tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.1.1
• Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606066312
• OCDE, (2013). Knowledge networks and markets. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 7, OECD Publishing. Paris. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/knowledge-networks-and-markets_5k44wzw9q5zv-en
• OCDE, (2021). OECD Economic Surveys: Spain 2021; OECD Publishing: Paris, France. https://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Spain-2021-OECD-economic-survey-overview.pdfE
• OEPM, (2021). La OEPM en cifras 2021. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas de España. Pp. 1-40. Madrid. NIPO (online): 116-22-009-8. https://www.oepm.es/export/sites/oepm/comun/documentos_relacionados/Publicaciones/Folletos/La_OEPM_en_Cifras_2021.pdf
• Park, G., & Park, Y. (2006). On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 793-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.006
• Patel, P., & Vega, M. (1999). Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages. Research Policy, 28(2-3),145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00117-6
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral pattern of technological change: towards a taxonomy and theory. Research Theory, 13(6), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
• Pérez, A., & Valle, R. (2011). How does the combination of R&D and types of knowledge matter for patent propensity? Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 28(1–2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.12.003
• Pisano, G. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393554
• Powell, W., & Giannella, E. (2010). Chapter 13 – Collective invention and inventor networks. Handbook of the Economic of Innovation, 1, 575-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01013-0
• Rasiah, R. (2004). Foreign Firms, Technological Capabilities and Economic Performance: Evidence from Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://www.elgaronline.com/display/1843769867.xml
• Ruiz Ortega, M. J. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities' moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.007
• Schoenecker, T., & Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications. IEEE Trans Eng Manage, 49(1), 36–44. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/985746
• Serrano, C. J. (2010). The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents. The Rand Journal of Economics, 41(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00117.x
• Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47(9), 1173–1190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/822556
• Somaya, D. (2012). Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084-1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312444447
• Somaya, D., Williamson, I., & Zhang, X. (2007). Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organization. Science, 18(6), 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0292
• Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academic Management, 48(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
• Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
• Teece, D. J., (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academic Management Perspective, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
• Todtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
• Tzabbar, D., Aharonson, B., Amburgey, T., & Al-Laham, A. (2008). When is the whole bigger than the sum of its parts? Bundling knowledge stocks for innovative success. Strategic Organization, 6(4), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008096363
• Ulhoi, J. P. (2012). Modes and orders of market entry: revisiting innovation and imitation strategies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.643559
• Van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6–7), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
• Van Looy, B., Du Plessis, M., Magerman, T., & Song, X. (2009). Data production methods for harmonized patent indicators: assignee sector allocation. Working Paper and Studies, Luxembourg: Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/5836029/KS-AV-06-002-EN.PDF
• Villasalero, M. (2015). Multi-business firms, knowledge flows and intra-network open innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0330-z
• Vossen, R. W. (1998). Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal, 16(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242698163005
• Warner, K. S., & Wager, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
• Wernerfelt B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management, 5(2), 171–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175
• Zahra, S., Neubaum, D., & Larrañeta, B. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, 60(10),1070–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.014