What is the Philosophy of Organismal Biology?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aaby, B. H., Desmond, H. (2021). Niche construction and teleology: Organisms as agents and contributors in ecology, development, and evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 36(5), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09821-2
• Aaby, B. H., Ramsey, G. (2022). Three Kinds of Niche Construction. "e British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(2), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz054
• Ågren, J. A. (2021). "The Gene’s-Eye View of Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Andrade, E. (2017). La teoría de sistemas en desarrollo: Una vía para resolver la tensión entre las perspectivas “internalista” y “externalista” en la biología evolutiva. Metatheoria - Revista de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia, 8, 145-155.
• Ankeny, R. A., Leonelli, S. (2021). Model Organisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Arthur, W. (2004). Biased Embryos and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Baedke, J. (2018). Above the Gene, Beyond Biology: Toward a Philosophy of Epigenetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Baedke, J. (2019). O Organism, Where Art thou? Old and New Challenges for Organism-Centered Biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 52(2), 293-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9549-4
• Baedke, J., Buklijas, T. (2022). Where organisms meet the environment: Introduction to the special issue ‘What counts as environment in biology and medicine: Historical, philosophical and sociological perspectives.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.09.008
• Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A. (2023). The Organism in Evolutionary Explanation: From Early 20th Century to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. In T. E. Dickins and B. J. A. Dickins (eds.), Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core "eory (pp. 117-146). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_8 Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Nieves Delgado, A. (2020). The holobiont concept before Margulis. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 334(3), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22931
• Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Prieto, G. I. (2021). Unknotting reciprocal causation between organism and environment. Biology & Philosophy, 36(5), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09815-0
• Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Vergara-Silva, F. (2020). Does the extended evolutionary synthesis entail extended explanatory power? Biology & Philosophy, 35(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-9736-5
• Barahona, A., Casanueva López, M., Vergara-Silva, F. (eds.). (2021). Biofilosofías para el Antropoceno: La teoría de la construcción de nicho desde la !losofía de la biología y la bioética. Ciudad de México: Heúresis, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM.
• Bateson, P. (2005). The return of the whole organism. Journal of Biosciences, 30(1), 31-39.
• Beatty, J. (1990). Evolutionary anti-reductionism: Historical re%ections. Biology and Philosophy, 5(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127488
• Beatty, J. (1994). The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biology and Philosophy, 9(3), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857940
• Benson, K. R. (1989). Biology’s “Phoenix”: Historical Perspectives on the Importance of the Organism1. American Zoologist, 29(3), 1067-1074. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/29.3.1067
• Bianco, G., Wolfe, C. T., Van de Vijver, G. (eds.). (2023). Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology (Vol. 31). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20529-3
• Bich, L., Bechtel, W. (2022). Control mechanisms: Explaining the integration and versatility of biological organisms. Adaptive Behavior, 30(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221074429
• Bonduriansky, R., Day, T. (2020). Extended Heredity: A New Understanding of Inheritance and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Bongard, J., Levin, M. (2021). Living things Are Not (20th Century) Machines: Updating Mechanism Metaphors in Light of the Modern Science of Machine Behavior. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.650726
• Brooks, D. S. (2019). Conceptual heterogeneity and the legacy of organicism: thoughts on the Life Organic. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 41(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0263-0
• Brun-Usan, M., Zimm, R., Uller, T. (2022). Beyond genotype-phenotype maps: Toward a phenotype-centered perspective on evolution. BioEssays, 44(9), 2100225. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100225
• Casanueva, M. (2014). Redes y paisajes conceptuales en la Evo-Devo. Metatheoria- Revista de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia, 5, 83-97.
• Castro García, Ò. (2011). La biosemiótica y la biología cognitiva en organismos sin sistema nervioso. Ludus Vitalis, 19(36).
• Cheung, T. (2014). Organismen: Agenten zwischen Innen- und Außenwelten 1780-1860. Bielefeld: Transcript.
• Chiu, L., Gilbert, S. F. (2015). The Birth of the Holobiont: Multi-species Birthing through Mutual Scaffolding and Niche Construction. Biosemiotics, 8(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9232-5
• Colombo, M., Wright, C. (2021). First principles in the life sciences: the free-energy principle, organicism, and mechanism. Synthese, 198(14), 3463-3488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01932-w
• Corris, A. (2020). De!ning the Environment in Organism-Environment Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01285
• Dawkins, R. (1976). "The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Donohue, C., Wolfe, C. T. (eds.). (2023). Vitalism and Its Legacy in Twentieth Century Life Sciences and Philosophy (Vol. 29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12604-8
• Esposito, M. (2016). Romantic Biology, 1890-1945. Nueva York: Routledge.Esposito, M. (2017). The Organismal Synthesis: Holistic Science and Developmental Evolution in the English-Speaking World, 1915-1954. In R. G. Delisle (ed.), "The Darwinian Tradition in Context: Research Programs in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 219-241). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Esposito, M. (2019). En el principio era la mano: Ernst Kapp y la relación entre máquina y organismo. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 14, 117-138.
• Etxeberria, A., Cortés-García, D. (2022). What is Special about Natural Drift as an Organism-Centered View of Evolution. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 107-109.
• Etxeberria, A., Umerez, J. (2006). Organización y organismo en la biología teórica. ¿Vuelta al organicismo? Ludus Vitalis, 26, 3-38.
• Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Baedke, J. (2023). Organisms and the Causes and Consequences of Selection: A Reply to Vidya et al. In T. E. Dickins and B. J. A. Dickins (eds.), Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Re#ections Upon Core theory (pp. 159-169). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_10
• Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Nieves Delgado, A., Baedke, J. (2021). Revisiting Hans Böker’s “Species Transformation through Reconstruction: Reconstruction through Active Reaction of Organisms” (1935). Biological theory, 16(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-020-00370-7
• Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Vergara-Silva, F. (2018a). Hierarchy theory of Evolution and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Some Epistemic Bridges, Some Conceptual Rifts. Evolutionary Biology, 45(2), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-017-9438-3
• Fábregas-Tejeda, A., Vergara-Silva, F. (2022). ‘Man-Made Futures’: Conrad Hal Waddington, Biological theory, and the Anthropocene. Azimuth: Philosophical Coordinates in Modern and Contemporary Age, 19(1), 35-56.
• Fábregas-Tejeda, A., y Vergara-Silva, F. (2018b). the emerging structure of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Where does Evo-Devo fit in? Theory in Biosciences, 137(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-018-0269-2
• Feiner, N., Brun-Usan, M., Uller, T. (2021). Evolvability and evolutionary rescue. Evolution & Development, 23(4), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12374
• Feiten, T. E. (2020). Mind After Uexküll: A Foray Into the Worlds of Ecological Psychologists and Enactivists. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00480
• Fisher, R. A. (1958/1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications.
• Fulda, F. C. (2017). Natural Agency: the Case of Bacterial Cognition. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2017.5
• Gambarotto, A., Nahas, A. (2022). Teleology and the organism: Kant’s controversial legacy for contemporary biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 93, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.005
• Gambarotto, A., Nahas, A. (2023). Nature and Agency: Towards a Post-Kantian Naturalism. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09882-w
• Gandolfi, G. (2023). Life, Concept and Purpose: the Organism as a Connection in Kant’s Critical Philosophy and Georges Canguilhem’s Historical Epistemology. In G. Bianco, C. T. Wolfe, and G. Van de Vijver (eds.), Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology (pp. 103-121). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20529-3_6
• Gerhart, J., Kirschner, M. (2007). The theory of facilitated variation. PNAS, 104(1), 8582-8589.
• Gerhart, J., Kirschner, M. (2010). Facilitated Variation. In M. Pigliucci and G. B. Müller (eds.), Evolution-"e Extended Syntesis (pp. 253-280). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Gilroy, S., Trewavas, T. (2022). Agency, teleonomy and signal transduction in plant systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, blac021. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac021
• Gomez-Marin, A., Ghazanfar, A. A. (2019). The Life of Behavior. Neuron, 104(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.017
• Griffiths, P., Stotz, K. (2013). Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Grobstein, C. (1966). New Patterns in the Organization of Biology. American Zoologist, 6(4), 621-626.
• Haraway, D. J. (1976). Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-century Developmental Biology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Harrison, D., Rorot, W., Laukaityte, U. (2022). Mind the matter: Active matter, soft robotics, and the making of bio-inspired artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 16. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.880724
• Heras-Escribano, M., Navas, L. L., Encabo, J. V. (eds.). (2022). Affordances y ciencia cognitiva: Introducción, teoría y aplicaciones. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Hernández-Ochoa, J. L., Vergara-Silva, F. (2022). Is It Necessary to Integrate Evo-Devo to the Analysis and Construction of Arti!cial Emotional Systems? Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 16. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbot.2022.728829
• Herrera, C. M., Bazaga, P. (2013). Epigenetic correlates of plant phenotypic plasticity: DNA methylation differs between prickly and nonprickly leaves in heterophyllous Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae) trees. The Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 171, 441-452.
• Herring, E., Radick, G. (2019). Emergence in Biology: From organicism to systems biology. In S. Gibb, R. F. Hendry, and T. Lancaster (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emergence (pp. 352-362). London: Routledge.
• Huneman, P. (2010). Assessing the Prospects for a Return of Organisms in Evolutionary Biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 341-371.
• Jablonka, E., Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in Four Dimensions, revised edition: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Kaiser, M. I., Trappes, R. (2021). Broadening the problem agenda of biological individuality: Individual differences, uniqueness and temporality. Biology & Philosophy, 36(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09791-5
• Köchy, K. (2008). Biophilosophie zur Einführung. Hamburgo: Junius Verlag.
• Kohn, G. M. (2019). How social systems persist: Learning to build a social network in an uncertain world. Animal Behaviour, 154, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.06.006
• Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 20151019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
• Maienschein, J. (2009). Whose View of Life?: Embryos, Cloning, and Stem Cells. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Martín-Villuendas, M. (2021a). No somos nuestros genes: Consideraciones en torno a la definición molecular de gen. Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin, 10(16), 103-137. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4678992
• Martín-Villuendas, M. (2021b). Una reconsideración pluralista del concepto de herencia. Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 26(3), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v26i3.10251
• McKenna, K. Z., Gawne, R., Nijhout, H. F. (2022). The genetic control paradigm in biology: What we say, and what we are entitled to mean. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 169-170, 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.02.003
• McLoone, B. (2020). Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 83, 101288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101288
• Menatti, L., Bich, L., Saborido, C. (2022). Health and environment from adaptation to adaptativity: a situated relational account. HLPS, 44, 38.
• Michelini, F., Köchy, K. (eds.). (2019). Jakob von Uexküll and Philosophy: Life, Environments, Anthropology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279096
• Michelini, F., Wunsch, M., Stederoth, D. (2018). Philosophy of nature and organism’s autonomy: On Hegel, Plessner and Jonas’ theories of living beings. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0212-3
• Milam, E. L. (2010). The Equally Wonderful Field: Ernst Mayr and Organismic Biology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 40(3), 279-317. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2010.40.3.279
• Moss, L. (2003). What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Mpodozis, J. (2022). Natural Drift: A Minimal theory with Maximal Consequences. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 094-101.
• Müller, G. B. (2021). Evo-Devo’s Contributions to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. In L. Nuño de la Rosa and G. B. Müller (eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide (pp. 1127-1138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_39
• Newman, S. A. (2022). Inherency and agency in the origin and evolution of biological functions. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, blac109. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac109
• Nicholson, D. J. (2013). Organisms ≠ Machines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4, Part B), 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.014
• Nicholson, D. J. (2014). The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12128
• Nicholson, D. J., Gawne, R. (2014). Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 47(2), 243-292.
• Nicholson, D. J., Gawne, R. (2015). Neither logical empiricism nor vitalism, but organicism: What the philosophy of biology was. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 37(4), 345-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0085-7
• Nowak, P. G., Stencel, A. (2022). How many ways can you die? Multiple biological deaths as a consequence of the multiple concepts of an organism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 43(2), 127-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-022-09583-2
• Nuño de la Rosa, L. (2010). Becoming Organisms: the Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 289-315.
• Nuño de la Rosa, L., Pavličev, M., y Etxeberria, A. (2021). Pregnant Females as Historical Individuals: An Insight From the Philosophy of Evo-Devo. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572106
• Nuño de la Rosa, L., Villegas, C. (2022). Chances and Propensities in Evo-Devo. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(2), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz048
• Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., Feldman, M. W., Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Oyama, S. (2000). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Pepper, J. W., Herron, M. D. (2008). Does Biology Need an Organism Concept? Biological Reviews, 83(4), 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00057.x
• Peterson, E. L. (2016). "e Life Organic: "e "eoretical Biology Club and the Roots of Epigenetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Petino Zappala, M. A., Barberis, S. D. (2018). Variedades de la explicación en evo-devo. Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia, 3(1), 18-31.
• Pontarotti, G., Dussault, A. C., Merlin, F. (2022). Conceptualizing the Environment in Natural Sciences: Guest Editorial. Biological theory, 17(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-021-00394-7
• Pradeu, T. (2010). What is An Organism? An Immunological Answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 247-267.
• Pradeu, T. (2017). Thirty years of Biology & Philosophy: Philosophy of which biology? Biology & Philosophy, 32(2), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9558-7
• Prieto, G. I. (2021). Kostas Kampourakis and Tobias Uller (eds.): Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020, 330 + x pp., £69.99 (hardcover), ISBN: 9781108491839. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 52(4), 613-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09571-5
• Raimondi, V. (2021). Autopoiesis and evolution: the role of organisms in natural drift. Adaptive Behavior, 29(5), 511-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211030694
• Rendón, C., Klier, G. (2017). El olvido del organismo: Un análisis de las concepciones acerca de lo vivo y su valor en la biología actual. Scientiae Studia, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.11606/51678-31662017000200012
• Rieppel, O. (2016). Phylogenetic Systematics: Haeckel to Hennig. Boca Ratón, Florida: CRC Press.
• Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Etxeberria, A., Moreno, A., Ibáñez, J. (2000). Organisms and their place in biology. "eory in Biosciences, 119, 209-233.
• Ruse, M. (ed.). (1989). What the Philosophy of Biology Is (Vol. 32). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1169-7
• Saborido, C., Heras-Escribano, M. (2023). Affordances and organizational functions. Biology & Philosophy, 38(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-023-09891-4
• Schwab, D. B., Casasa, S., Moczek, A. P. (2019). On the Reciprocally Causal and Constructive Nature of Developmental Plasticity and Robustness. Frontiers in Genetics, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2018.00735
• Shields, C. (2017). What Organisms Once Were and Might Yet Be. Philosophy & "eory in Biology, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ptb.6959004.0009.007
• Sims, M. (2021). A continuum of intentionality: Linking the biogenic and anthropogenic approaches to cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 36(6), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09827-w
• Skillings, D. (2016). Holobionts and the ecology of organisms: Multi-species communities or integrated individuals? Biology & Philosophy, 31(6), 875-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9544-0
• Soto, A. M., Longo, G., Miquel, P.-A., Montevil, M., Mossio, M., Perret, N., Pocheville, A., Sonnenschein, C. (2016). Toward a theory of organisms: three founding principles in search of a useful integration. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 122(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.07.006
• Soto, A. M., Sonnenschein, C. (2018). Reductionism, Organicism, and Causality in the Biomedical Sciences: A Critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 61(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2018.0059
• Soto, A. M., Sonnenschein, C. (2021). The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 165, 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.07.001
• Soto, A., Sonnenschein, C. (2023). Georges Canguilhem, the Health-Disease Transition and the Return of Organicism. Organisms. Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(1), 41-48.
• Sprenger, F. (2019). Epistemologien des Umgebens: Zur Geschichte, Ökologie und Biopolitik künstlicher environments. transcript Verlag.
• Stotz, K. (2017). Why developmental niche construction is not selective niche construction: And why it matters. Interface Focus, 7(5), 20160157. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0157
• Strong, D. R. (1980). Null hypotheses in ecology. Synthese, 43(2), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413928
• Suárez, J., Stencel, A. (2020). A part-dependent account of biological individuality: Why holobionts are individuals and ecosystems simultaneously. Biological Reviews, 95(5), 1308-1324. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12610
• Sultan, S. E. (2015). Organism and Environment: Ecological Development, Niche Construction, and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sultan, S. E., Moczek, A. P., Walsh, D. (2021). Bridging the explanatory gaps: What can we learn from a biological agency perspective? BioEssays, 44(1), 2100185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100185
• Trappes, R. (2022). Individual differences, uniqueness, and individuality in behavioural ecology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 96, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.08.007
• Trappes, R., Nematipour, B., Kaiser, M. I., Krohs, U., van Benthem, K. J., Ernst, U. R., Gadau, J., Korsten, P., Kurtz, J., Schielzeth, H., Schmoll, T., Takola, E. (2022). How Individualized Niches Arise: De!ning Mechanisms of Niche Construction, Niche Choice, and Niche Conformance. BioScience, 72(6), 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac023
• Trivers, R. L. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
• Triviño, V. (2022). Towards a characterization of metaphysics of biology: Metaphysics for and metaphysics in biology. Synthese, 200(5), 428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03897-3
• Triviño, V., Suárez, J. (2020). Holobionts: Ecological communities, hybrids, or biological individuals? A metaphysical perspective on multispecies systems. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 84, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101323
• Umerez, J. (2013). El enfoque jerárquico en el núcleo de los planteamientos organicistas y sistémicos en biología. Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 18, 469-483. https://doi.org/10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v0i0.1185
• Veigl, S. J. (2022). Adaptive immunity or evolutionary adaptation? Transgenerational immune systems at the crossroads. Biology & Philosophy, 37(5), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09869-8
• Wake, M. H. (1984). Science as a Way of Knowing-Evolution: the Biology of Whole Organisms. American Zoologist, 24(2), 443-450. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/24.2.443
• West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: "e New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Wolfe, C. T. (2014). The organism as ontological go-between: Hybridity, boundaries and degrees of reality in its conceptual history. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 48, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.06.006
• Yılmaz, Ö. (2022). Biyoloji Felsefesinde Organizma Kavramı. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, 1, 78-86.
• Zach, M., Greslehner, G. P. (2023). Understanding immunity: An alternative framework beyond defense and strength. Biology & Philosophy, 38(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-023-09893-2