Improving graduate students learning through the use of Moodle

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alier FM, Gerrero MJ, Poch JP (2010). Towards mobile learning applications integration with learning management systems. In Goh TT (Ed.), Multiplataform e-learning systems and technologies: mobile devices for ubiquitous ICT- based education. Hersehy, PA: IGI Global. pp.182-194
• Amundsen C (1993). The evolution of theory in distance education. In Desmond Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge. pp.61-80
• Antonenko P, Toy S, Niederhauser D (2004). Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment: What Open Source Has to Offer. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL.
• Arnal J, Rincn D Del, Latorre A (1992). Investigacin educativa: fundamentos y metodologas 1st Edition. Barcelona: Labor.
• Belenky MF, Clinchy BM, Goldberger NR, Tarule JM (1986). Womens ways of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Benyon D, Mival O (2012). Blended spaces for collaborative creativity. In designing collaborative interactive spaces workshop. 25 May. Capri, Italy. view
• Berends M (2006). Survey Methods in Educational Research. In Green JL, Camilla G, Elmore P B (Eds.). Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Washington: AERA.
• Britain S, Liber O (1999). A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments.
• Brook C, Oliver R (2003). Online learning communities: Investigating a design framework. Aust. J. Educ.l Technol. 19(2):139-160.
• Bruce B, Curson N (2001). UEA Virtual Learning Environment, P.e. report editor: Norwich.
• Celik L (2010). Evaluation of the views of pre-service teachers taught with Moodle during the course named instructional technology and material design on the use of teaching materials. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 9:1793-1797.
• Chavan A, Pavri S (2004). Open Source Learning Management in Moodle. Linux J. 1(2):78-97.
• Chen HR, Huang HL (2010). User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: design and analysis. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(3):70-77.
• Cole J, Foster H (2007). Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. London: OReilly.
• Connolly TM, MacArthur E, Stansfield M, McLellan E (2007). A Quasi-Experimental Study of Three Online Learning Courses in Computing. Comput. Educ. 49(2):345-359.
• Conrey FR, Smith ER (2007). Attitude Representation: Attitudes as Patterns in a Distributed, Connectionist Representational System. Soc. Cogn. 25(5):718-735.
• Corbin J, Strauss A (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1):3-21.
• Coskun A, Arslan A (2014). Moodling English Language. Education 134(3):275-281.
• Coulby C, Hennesseym S, Davie N, Fuller R (2010). The use of mobile technology for work-based assessment: the student experience. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 42(2):251-265.
• Crasborn F, Hennissen P, Brouwer N, Korthagen F, Bergen T (2011). Exploring a two-dimensional model of mentor teacher roles in mentoring dialogues. Teach. Teach. Educ. 27:320-331.
• Dawson S (2006). Relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 9(3):153-162.
• DeNeui DL, Dodge TL (2006). Asynchronous Learning Networks and Student Outcomes: The Utility of Online Learning Components in Hybrid Courses. J. Instr. Psychol. 33(4):256-259.
• Dougiamas M, Taylor PC (2003). Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. In D. Lassner and C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. pp.171-178
• Duff TM, Jonassen DH (1992). Constructivism: New Implications for Instructional Technology. In Duffy TM and Jonassen DH. (Eds), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A conversation. pp.1-16.
• Ellis RK (2009). Learning Managament Systems. Alexandria, VI: American Society for Training Development (ASTD).
• Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007). The benefits of facebokk friends: Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. J. Computer-Mediated Commun. 12(4):1143-1168
• Escobar-Rodriguez T, Monge-Lozano P (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Comput. Educ. 58:1085-1093
• Fatih A, Demirkan H (2015). Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Comput. Human Behav. 42:176-186.
• Friedman TL (2006). The world is flat. The globalized world in the twenty-first century. Victoria: Penguin. (rev. ed.)
• Gibbs G (2006). Why assessment is changing. In C. Bryan, y K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge. p. 11-22
• Goyal E, Purohit S (2010). Study of Using Learning Management System in a Management Course. SIES J. Manage. 6(2):11-20.
• Gunawardena CN, Zittle FJ (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction with a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am. J. Distance Educ. 11:8-26.
• Habermas J (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 1: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
• Hammond M (2013). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. Brit. J. Educ. Technol., 45(2):191-201.
• Hwang GJ, Tsai CC (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 42(4):65-70.
• Jin SH (2005). Analyzing student-student and student-instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. Int. J. Instr. Media. 32(1):59-67.
• Katsamani M, Retalis S, Boloudakis M (2012). Designing a Moodle Course with the CADMOS Learning Design Tool. Educ. Media Int. 49(4):317-331.
• Kerlinger F, Lee H (2000). Foundations of Behavioral research. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers.
• Kirner TG, Custodio CA, Kirner C (2008). Usability evaluation of the moodle system from the teachers perspective. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference e-Learning. 22-25 July. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Kirner TG, Saraiva AV (2007). Software Usability Evaluation: an Empirical Study. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Funchal, Portugal. pp.459-465.
• Lave J. Wenger E (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Maki WS, Maki RH (2002). Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of Web-based and lecture courses. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 8:85-98.
• Martn-Blas T, Serrano-Fernndez A (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Comput. Educ. 52:35-44.
• Mateo J, Sangr A (2007). Designing online learning assessment through alternative approaches: facing de concerns. Eur. J. Open Distance e-Learning. pp.3-14.
• Medina M, Martnez IJ, Briones AJ, Hernndez E (2014). Using moodle virtual platform in teacher for secondary school teachers that have little knowledge of ICT through a working group offered by the educational administration. Paper presented at the 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. 10-12 March. Valencia, Spain.
• Melton J (2006). The LMS Moodle: A Usability Evaluation. Prefectural University of Kumamoto, Japan.
• Mentzer G, Cryan J, Teclehaimanot B (2007). Two Peas in a Pod? A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Web-Based Classrooms. J. Technol. Teach. Educ. 15(2):233-246.
• Moodle (2007). Moodle Documentation. Retrieved from: http://docs.moodle.org (Access 12.11.2013)
• Morgan G (2003). Faculty Use of Course Management Systems. (Research Study, Vol.2). Boulder, CO: EDUCASE Center for Applied Research.
• N-ez JC, Cerezo R, Bernardo A, Rosrio P, Valle A, Fernndez E, Surez N (2011). Implementation of training programs in self-regulated learning strategies in Moodle format: Results of an experience in higher education. Psicothema 23(2):274-281.
• Oblinger D (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers and Millenials: Understanding the new students. Educ. Rev. 3:37-45.
• Peat M, Franklin S (2002). Supporting Student Learning: The Use of Computer-based 9. Formative Assesment Modules. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 33(5):515-523.
• Perteneder F, Grossauer C, Seifried T, Walney J, Brosz J, Tang A et al. (2012). Idea playground: When brainstorming is not enough. In Designing collaborative interactive spaces workshop, 25May. Capri, Italy.
• Picciano AG (2002). Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks. 6(1):21-40.
• Psycharis S, Chalatzoglidis G, Kalogiannakis M (2013). Moodle as a Learning Environment in Promoting Conceptual Understanding for Secondary School Students. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 9(1): 11-21.
• Rehak DR, Mason R (2003). Engaging with the Learning Object Economy. In Littlejohn, Allison: Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-Learning. London: Kogan Page. pp. 22-30.
• Richardson J, Swan K (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students perceived learning and satisfaction. J. Asynchronous Learn. 6(1):21-40.
• Rosenberg M (2001). E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Columbus: McGraw-Hill.
• Ross I (2008). Moodle, la plataforma para la ense-anza y organizacin escolar. Ikastorratza, e- Revista de Didctica 2:1-12. view
• Sagun A, Demirkan H (2009). On-line critiques in collaborative design studio. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 19(1):79-99.
• Schuman H, Presser S (1996). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Sharpe R, Benfield G, Lessner E, DeCicco E (2005). Learner Scoping Study: Final Report. view
• Sharpe R, Benfield G, Roberts G, Francis R (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice undertaken for the Higher Education Academy. view
• Smith A (1999). Web-based Training. Electronic Libr. 17:338.
• Sommerville I (2004). Software Engineering. MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, Reading.
• Soyibo K, Hudson A (2000). Effects of Computer-assisted Instruction (CAI) on 11th 8. Graders Attitudes to Biology and CAI and Understanding of Reproduction in Plants and Animals. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 18(2):191-199.
• Steyaert J (2005). Web based higher education, the inclusion/exclusion paradox. J. Technol. Human Serv. 23(1):67-68. DOI: 10.1300/J017v23no1_05
• Swan K, Shea P, Fredericksen E, Pickett A, Pelz W, Maher G (2000). Building Knowledge Building Communities: Consistency, Contact and Communication in the Virtual Classroom. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 23(4):359-83.
• Swan K (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Dist. Educ. 22:306-331.
• Toth A, Pentelnyi P, Toth P (2006). Virtual Learning Aspects of Curriculum Development in Technical Teacher Training, in Proceedings of Intelligent Engineering Systems. IEEE: London.
• Vaughan N (2007). Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education. Int. J. E-Learning. 6(1):81-94.
• Wang M, Chen J, Khan MJ (2014). Mobile cloud learning for higher education: A case study of Moodle in the cloud. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15(2):141-149.
• Weitzman L, Lewis-Bowen A, Evanchik S (2006). Using Open Source Software To Design, Develop, and Deploy a Collaborative Web Site, Part 1: Introduction and Overview. view
• Wiley DA (2000). Connecting Learning Objects to Instructional Design Theory: A Definition, A Metaphor, and A Taxonomy. In David A. Wiley. The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version, Digital Learning Environments Research Group, Utah (USA). pp.1-35.
• Yueh H, Hsu S (2008). Designing a learning management system to support instruction. Communications of the ACM. 51(4):59-63.
• Zenha-Rela M, Carvalho R (2006). Work in Progress: Self Evaluation through Monitored Peer Review Using the Moodle Platform. Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, San Diego, California. pp. 28-31.