Qualitative Research for Interdisciplinary StudiesMultiple Methodologies for Multiple Disciplines

  1. Elizabeth M. Pope 1
  2. Catarina Brandão 2
  3. Kyle Bower 3
  4. Sonia Verdugo-Castro 4
  1. 1 University of West Georgia, USA
  2. 2 University of Porto, Portugal
  3. 3 University of Georgia, USA
  4. 4 University of Salamanca, Spain
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
New Trends in Qualitative Research

ISSN: 2184-7770

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 16

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.36367/NTQR.16.2023.E825 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: New Trends in Qualitative Research

Resumen

The intent of research is to improve the lives of individuals and communities. Through qualitative research specifically, we can deepen our understanding of reality and investigate the nuances of how people experience and make meaning from it. Qualitative research, as a scientific approach, enables researchers to examine phenomena from the point of view of those who live it. Qualitative researchers seek to understand individuals’ experiences, perceptions, thoughts, and emotions that are constructed through social rules, cultural patterns shaped by the communities and societies in which they live. Although research objectives differ, qualitative research is defined by a systematic process of researchers' identifying and interrogating their positionality, subjectivities, and influential paradigms. In this introduction readers will note similar methodologies; however, these are presented in the context of multiple disciplines. This volume demonstrates the evolving interdisciplinarity of qualitative research methods that engages scholars in innovative conversation. This editorial offers a peek at the interdisciplinary potential of qualitative research. Such interdisciplinary prowess is found in Volume 16 of New Trends in Qualitative Research.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Balogun, J. A., Adekanmbi, A. A., & Balogun, F. A. (2023). Surgical residents as 'second victims' following exposure to medical errors in a tertiary health training facility in Nigeria: a phenomenology study. Patient Safety in Surgery, 17(1), 1-8. https://doaj.org/article/efff050e781b42199567827ebca007ed
  • Barrios, B. E. (2015). Tres momentos críticos de la Teoría Fundamentada Clásica [Three critical moments of classic grounded theory]. SAPIENS, 16(1), 31–47. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1317-58152015000100003
  • Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2023). Grounded theory: A practical guide (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  • Bower, K. L. (2022). Implementing QDAS throughout an evaluation project using the Five-Level QDA Method. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(4), 620-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211027952
  • Cárcel Carrasco, F. J., & Roldán Porta, C. (2013). Los métodos de investigación cualitativa enfocados al mantenimiento industrial [Qualitative research methods focused on industrial maintenance]. Técnica industrial, 303, 40–48. https://m.riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/51866/C%C3%A1rcel%20Carrasco%2C%20FJ%2C%20Rold%C3%A1n- Porta%2C%20Carlos_Los%20m%C3%A9todos%20de%20investigaci%C3%B3n%20cualitativa....pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). SAGE.
  • Choi, K. M., & Oh, I. (2021). A phenomenological approach to understanding sexual minority college students in South Korea. Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development, 49(4), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12227
  • Daun, M., Grubb, A. M., Stenkova, V., Tenbergen, B. (2023). A systematic literature review of requirements engineering education. Requirements Engineering, 28(2), 145-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9
  • Dzhalila, D., Siahaan, D., Fauzan, R., Asyrofi, R., & Karimi, M. I. (2023). A systematic review on blockchain technology in software engineering. Journal ELTIKOM: Journal Teknik Elektro, 7(1), 38-49. https://doaj.org/article/a252c4856fac4aaca030f40057b106f3
  • Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (1999). Moral order and the Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. In P. Jalbert (Ed.), Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches (pp. 195-230). University Press of America.
  • Fischer, H., Seidenstricker, S., & Poeppelbuss, J. (2023). The triggers and consequences of digital sales: A systematic literature review. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 43(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2022.2102029
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
  • Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593-611). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
  • González Cumpa, J. L. (2014). Propuesta de un análisis cualitativo de riesgos en etapas de licitación de obras públicas de construcción [Proposal for a qualitative risk analysis in tendering stages of public construction works]. Universidad de Piura. https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/handle/11042/1877
  • Gonzalez-Prieto, A., Perez, J., Diaz, J., & Lopez-Fernandez, D. (2023). Reliability in software engineering qualitative research through inter-coder agreement. Journal of Systems and Software, 202, Article 111707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111707
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
  • Husserl, E. (2017). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Martino Fine Books.
  • Jaumot-Pascual, N., Ong, M., Silva, C., & Martinez-Gudapakkam, A. (2021). Women of color leveraging community cultural wealth to persist in computing and tech graduate education: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Education Sciences, 11(12), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120797
  • Jerpseth, H., Kaasen, A., Lafontan, S. R., & Eri, T. S. (2023). Experiences of Norwegian co-parents during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 18(1), Article 2215578. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2215578
  • Klank, C., Himmelsbach, I., & Doh, M. (2023). A qualitative case study focusing on the relationship of biography, education, and ICT use of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 49(5), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2209447
  • Langdridge, D. (2018). Phenomenological psychology. Oxford Bibliographies: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0210
  • Lester, J. N., & O’Reilly, M. (2018). Applied conversational analysis: Social interaction in institutional settings. SAGE.
  • Levitt, H. M. (2021). Essentials of critical-constructivist grounded theory research. Essentials of Qualitative Methods: APA.
  • Loose, F., Hudders, L., Vanwesenbeek, I., De Jans, S. (2023). Preschoolers and advertising: A systematic literature review and future research agenda on the effects of advertising on preschool children. Journal of Advertising, 52(3), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2043794
  • Lycett, D., & Patel, R. (2023). Spiritual care within dietetic practice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Religion & Health, 62(2), 1223-1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01555-z
  • Mellado, B. H., Pilger, T. L., Neto, O. B. P., Silva, J. C. R. e., Nogueira, A. A., Brandão, C. d. V., & Reis, F. J. C. d. (2020). Daily life attitudes of women with moderate or severe chronic pelvic pain. A qualitative study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 254, 109-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.001
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
  • Pereira dos Santos, M. L., & dos Santos Lopes, H. (2023). Humanitarian logistics in natural disaster management: A COVID-19- oriented systematic literature review (SLR). Revista de Gestao e Secretariado-Gesec, 14(2), 1986–2001. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i2.1678
  • Pope, E. M. (2020). “This is a head, hearts, and hands enterprise”: Adult learning in interfaith dialogue. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619888632
  • Pope, E. M., & Paulus, T. M. (2023). Agree to disagree? Allowing for ideological difference during interfaith dialogue following scriptural reasoning. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 58(1), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.0002
  • Quraishi, Z. (2023). Addressing mental health, misinformation, & religious tensions among South Asian students across California higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative research study. Heliyon, 9(6), e16396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16396
  • Rothuizen-Lindenschot, M., Graff, M. J. L., de Boer, L., de Groot, I. J. M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G., Steultjens, E. M. J., & Koene, S. (2023). Using PRPP-Assessment for measuring change in everyday activities by home-based videos: An exploratory case series study in children with multiple disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. Advance onlne publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12893
  • Roulston, K. (2010). Introducing ethnomethodological analysis to the field of music education. Music Education Research, 3(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800120089205
  • Sánchez-Candamio, M. (1999). Evaluación de programas de salud desde la perspectiva de la metodología cualitativa [Evaluation of health programmes from the perspective of qualitative methodology]. Atención Primaria, 24(8), 487–491. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-atencion-primaria-27-articulo-evaluacion-programas-salud-desde-perspectiva-13401
  • Shoneye, C. L., Kwasnicka, D., Mullan, B., Pollard, C. M., Boushey, C. J., & Kerr, D. A. Dietary assessment methods used in adult digital weight loss interventions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, 36(3), 997-1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13101
  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Snijders, D., van der Duin, P., Marchau, V., & van Doorn, G. J. (2018). Scenarios for ICT-related education: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Future Studies, 23(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0002
  • Sousa, B., & Brandão, C. (2019). Leader development: evaluating a leader development program. Proceedings of Leadership and Human Resources Development, Sofia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347984459_Leader_Development_Evaluating_a_Leader_Development_Program
  • Spradley, J. (2016). Participant observation (reissue). Waveland Press, Inc.
  • Steinmetz, K. F., & Holt, T. J. (2023). Falling for social engineering: A qualitative analysis of social engineering policy recommendations. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117501
  • Steinmetz, K. F., Holt, T. J., & Brewer, C. G. (2023). Developing and implementing social engineering-prevention policies: A qualitative study. Security Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-023-00385-2
  • Thornburn, M., & Stolz, S. A. (2020). Understanding experience better in educational contexts: the phenomenology of embodied subjectivity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1632798
  • Tonui, B. C., Miller, V. J., & Adeniji, D. O. (2023). Older immigrant adults experiences with social isolation: A qualitative interpretive meta synthesis. Aging & Mental Health, 27(6), 1068-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2068131
  • Topcu, G., Mhizha-Murira, J. R., Griffiths, H., Bale, C., Drummond, A., Fitzmimmons, D., Potter, K., Evangelou, N., & das Nair, R. (2023). Experiences of receiving a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Disability & Rehabilitation, 45(5), 772-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2046187
  • Tubaro, P., Ryan, L., & D’Angelo, A. (2016). The visual sociogram in qualitative and mixed methods research. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3864
  • Urbano Gil, H. (2007). El enfoque etnometodológico en la investigación científica [The ethnomethodological approach in scientific research]. Liberabit. Revista Peruana de Psicología, 13, 89-91. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-48272007000100011
  • van de Velde, C., Boudreault, S., & Berniard, L. (2023). Youth loneliness in pandemic times: A qualitative study in Quebec and Ontario. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), Article 2223671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2223671
  • Vargas Cuadros, L. A. (2015). Análisis cualitativo de la integración de áreas en un proyecto de obra civil [Qualitative analysis of integration project areas in civil engineering]. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/handle/10654/13610
  • Verdugo-Castro, S. (2019). Detection of needs in the lines of work of third sector entities for unemployed women in situations of social exclusion. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 0(34), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2019.34.12
  • Verdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2020). Interviews of Spanish women in STEM: a multimedia analysis about their experiences. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020). ACM.
  • Vivar, C. G., Arantzamendi, M., López-Dicastillo, O., & Gordo Luis, C. (2010). La Teoría Fundamentada como Metodología de Investigación Cualitativa en Enfermería [Grounded theory as a qualitative research methodology in nursing]. Index de Enfermería, 19(4), 283–288. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962010000300011&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
  • Wang, X., Edison, H., Khanna, D., & Rafiq, U. (2023). How many papers should you review? A research synthesis of systematic literature reviews in software engineering. (Working Paper). http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06056
  • Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study research in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet