Normalidad de goznesdel constitutivismo neo-kantiano al conocimiento incondicionado

  1. Modesto Manuel Gómez
Revue:
Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía

ISSN: 0210-4857

Année de publication: 2024

Número: 51

Pages: 57-82

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía

Résumé

The main purpose of this article is to anchor the basic principles of judgmental performances into reality, and thus, to capture the vertical axis of cognition. To this end, it is argued that the normative force of explicit, discursive self-knowledge is neither merely grounded in dialectical inescapability nor in default assumptions. The goal is to argue that the ultimate überhinge is so perfectly known that the questions of justification, truth-value and empirical cognoscibility lose any sense in regards to it. Hinge normativity, which can be reduced neither to epistemic (telic) normativity nor to practical normativity, emerges from this view. The shortcomings of neo-Kantian views of the sources of normativity in gnoseology are exposed and analysed.

Références bibliographiques

  • Coliva, A. (2015), Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ferrero, L. (2018), “Inescapability Revisited”. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 41: 4, 113-158.
  • Frankfurt, H. (1988), The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hazlett, A. (2016), “Intellectual Loyalty”. In: Coliva, A., Moyal-Sharrock, D. (eds.), Hinge Epistemology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 254-278.
  • Kant, I. (1781/2007), Critique of Pure Reason. (Intr. Howard Caygill. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • _____ (1788/2015), Critique of Practical Reason. (Intr. Andrews Reath. Trans. Mary Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pritchard, D. (2016), Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Sosa, E. (2011), Knowing Full Well. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • _____ (2015), Judgment and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • _____ (2021), Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What It Explains. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • _____ (forthcominga), “Judgment and Epistemic Normativity”. (Ms. cited with permission by the author), pp. 1-11.
  • _____ (forthcomingb), “Default Assumptions and Pure Thought”. (Ms. cited with permission of the author), pp. 1-20.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969/2004), On Certainty. (Trans. Denis Paul, G.E.M. Anscombe). Oxford: Blackwell.