Escala de retroalimentación estudiantil sobre la gestión didáctica en entornos virtuales

  1. Ana D. Jiménez
  2. Tomás Fontaines-Ruiz
  3. Jonathan N. Herrera-Peña
  4. Mercedes Sánchez-Barba
Journal:
Formación Universitaria

ISSN: 0718-5006

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 16

Issue: 6

Pages: 81-92

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Formación Universitaria

Abstract

The aim of this research was to construct and validate a scale that measures the factors considered by students to provide feedback on teaching practices in virtual environments. The scale underwent an analytical process that involved expert evaluation, exploratory factor analysis, assessment of item response model fit to observed data using the Rating Scale Model, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale consisted of three factors that accounted for 66.4% of the variance associated with didactic feedback on instructional management. The factorial model shows evidence of good fit and a global reliability of 0.962 is reported. It is concluded that the generated instrument provides evidence of validity and reliability, enabling its availability to the teaching and research community to further enhance the value of feedback as a source for continuous improvement of instructional practices.

Bibliographic References

  • Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Díaz-García, I., y Orellana, N., Estructura de las competencias del siglo XXI en alumnado del ámbito educativo. Factores personales influyentes, https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.23853, Educación XX1, 23(1), 45-74 (2019)
  • Anderson, J., Frequent Feedback through Google Forms, https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1411408, PRIMUS, 29(2), 124-137 (2019)
  • Boud, D., y Dawson, P., What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 158–171 (2021)
  • Canabal, C., y Margalef, L., La retroalimentación: La clave para una evaluación orientada al aprendizaje, https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v21i2.10329, Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 21(2), 149–170 (2017)
  • Carless, D., y Boud, D., The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325 (2018)
  • Carless, D., y Winstone, N., Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy, https://doi.org/10.1080/135625º17.2020.1782372, Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163 (2023)
  • Chura-Quispe, G., Castro, R.A.G., Medina, M.P.L., y Chura, E.C.S., The effect of the virtual Flipped Classroom on the academic writing: self-perception of university students, https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.92509, Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 65, 121–148 (2022)
  • Contreras-Pérez, G., y Zúñiga-González, C.G., Concepciones de profesores sobre retroalimentación: una revisión de la literatura, https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m9-19.cpsr, Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 9(19), 69-90 (2017)
  • Dawson, P., Henderson, M., y otros cinco autores, What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36 (2019)
  • de Kleijn, R.A.M., Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy: an instructional model for student feedback processes, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967283, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 186-200 (2023)
  • Espasa, A., y Meneses, J., Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4, Higher Education, 59, 277–292 (2010)
  • Fleming, J., y Merino-Soto, C., Medidas de simplicidad y de ajuste factorial: un enfoque para la evaluación de escalas construidas factorialmente, Revista de Psicología (Peru), ISSN: 0254-9247 23(2), 249–266 (2005)
  • Follong, B. M., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., y otros tres autores, Evaluating an integrated nutrition and mathematics curriculum: primary school teachers’ and students’ experiences, https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S1368980022000386, Public Health Nutrition, 25(8), 2099-2110 (2022)
  • Frías-Navarro, D., y Pascual-Soler, M., Prácticas del análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) en la investigación sobre conducta del consumidory marketing, Suma Psicológica, ISSN 0121-4381,19(1), 45-58 (2012)
  • Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., y Molloy, E., Identifying Feedback That Has Impact, The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education, Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., y Molloy, E., ISBN 978-3-030-25111-6, 15–34, London, UK (2019)
  • Henderson, M., Phillips, M., y otros cinco autores, Conditions that enable effective feedback, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807, Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1401–1416 (2019)
  • Hoseini-Beidokhti, M., Abaeian, G., Abedini-Baghbadorani, S., y Latifi, S.M., Quality and Effectiveness of Virtual Education From the Viewpoint of Rehabilitation Professors and Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic, https://doi.org/10.32598/irj.20.3.1665.1, Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, 20(3), 441–448 (2022)
  • Huang, L., Zhao, H., y otros seis autores, Students as co-constructors in a computer core curriculum, 10.1109/ICCSE51940.2021.9569321, 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), 21- 25 (2021)
  • Kuehl, S.E., y Spicer, J.O., Using entrustable professional activities to better prepare students for their postgraduate medical training: A medical student’s perspective, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00731-x, Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(6), 359–364 (2022)
  • Lobos, K., Bustos, C., Cobo-Rendón, R.C., y Cisternas, N.V., Características psicométricas de un cuestionario de expectativas hacia la educación virtual en estudiantes universitarios durante la pandemia COVID-19, http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062022000100003, Formación Universitaria, 15(1), 3–18 (2022)
  • López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., Lampropoulos, G., y Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Design and validation of a questionnaire for the evaluation of educational experiences in the metaverse in Spanish students (METAEDU), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11364, Heliyon, 8(11), 1-13 (2022)
  • Malecka, B., Boud, D., y Carless, D., Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784, Teaching in Higher Education, 27(7), 908–922 (2022)
  • Malkewitz, C.P., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., y Hardt, J., Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ωt and the greatest lower bound, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 1-10 (2023)
  • Matsui, T., y Inoue, M., Perspectives of medical students on future work-life balance in Japan: A qualitative study using postlecture comments, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.579, Journal of General and Family Medicine, 24(1), 3–8 (2023)
  • Mavrou, I., Análisis factorial exploratorio: cuestiones conceptuales y metodológicas, https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael019283, Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a La Enseñanza de Lenguas, 19, 71–80 (2015)
  • Molloy, E., Boud, D., y Henderson, M., Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540 (2020)
  • Pinto, L., Rediseñar la escuela para y con las habilidades del siglo XXI, 1ª Ed., 1-136, Fundación Santillana, ISBN 978-950- 46-5869-6, Buenos Aires, Argentina, (2019)
  • Reinert, M., Le rôle de la répétition dans la représentation du sens et son approche statistique par la méthode “ALCESTE”, https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.100, Semiótica, 147, 389–420 (2003)
  • Winstone, N., Boud, D., Dawson, P., y Heron, M., From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1902467, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 213–230 (2022)
  • Winstone, N.E., y Boud, D., The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687, Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667 (2022)
Data source: Dialnet