Formas de matematización de la filosofía naturalGalileo y la redefinición sociocognitiva de sus matemáticas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aristóteles. (1995). Tratados de Lógica (Organon) II. Trad. Miguel Candel S. Madrid: Gredos.
• Barozzi, F. (1560). Opusculum, in quo una Oratio, et duae Quaestiones: altera de certitudine, et altera de medietate Mathematicarum continentur, Padua, Excudebat Gratiosus Perchacinus
• Bertoloni-Meli, D. (2006). Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Biancani, G. (1615). De mathematicarum natura dissertatio. Bolonia, B. Cocchi.
• Biagioli, M. (2008). Galileo cortesano: la práctica de la ciencia en la cultura del absolutismo. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
• Burtt, E. A. (1954). The metaphysical foundations of modern science. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.
• Catena, P. (1563). Oratio pro idea methodi. Pud Gratiosum Ðerchacinum (IS), Percacino, Grazioso.
• Crombie, A. C. (1990). Science, Art and Nature in Medieval and Modern Thought. London: The Hambledon Press.
• Dear, P. (1995). Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Dear, P. (2009). Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and its Ambitions, 1500-1700. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Drake, S. (1975a). Galileo’s New Science of Motion. In M. L. R. Bonelli & W. Shea (Eds.), Reason, experiment, and mysticism in the scientific revolution (pp. 131–156). New York: Science History Publications.
• Drake, S. (1975b). The Role of Music in Galileo’s Experiments. Scientific American, 232(6), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0675-98
• Drake, S. (1978). Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Drake, S., & Drabkin, I. E. (1969). Mechanics in sixteenth-century Italy: Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo, & Galileo (First Edition edition). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Ducheyne, S. (2006). Galileo’s Interventionist Notion of “Cause.” The Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(3), 443–464.
• Feldhay, R. (1998). The use and abuse of mathematical entities: Galileo and the Jesuits revisited. In The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (pp. 80–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Finocchiaro, M. (2010). Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. Heidelberg, London, New york: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Galilei, G. (1603a, 1604). Folio 107v. Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale/Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, Firenze.
• Galilei, G. (1603b, 1604). Folio 152r. Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale/Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, Firenze.
• Galilei, G. (1604). Folio 128r. Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale/Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, Firenze.
• Galilei, G. (1891). Le opere di Galileo Galilei : edizione nazionale sotto gli auspicii di sua maesta il re d’Italia. (A. Favaro, Ed.) (Vol. 2). Firenze: G. Barbera.
• Galilei, G. (1900). Le opere di Galileo Galilei : edizione nazionale sotto gli auspicii di sua maesta il re d’Italia. (A. Favaro, Ed.) (Vol. 10). Firenze: G. Barbera.
• Galilei, G. (1901). Le opere di Galileo Galilei : edizione nazionale sotto gli auspicii di sua maesta il re d’Italia. (A. Favaro, Ed.) (Vol. 11). Firenze: G. Barbera.
• Galilei, G. (1960). The Assayer. Trad. Stillman Drake and C. D. O’Malley. in The Controversy on the Comets of 1618. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Galilei, G. (1994). Diálogo sobre los dos máximos sistemas del mundo ptolemaico y copernicano. Trad. Antonio Beltrán. Madrid: Alianza.
• Galilei, G. (2003). Diálogos acerca de dos nuevas ciencias. Trad. José San Román. Buenos Aires: Losada.
• Galilei, G. (n.d.). De Motu Antiquiora. (R. Fredette, Trans.). Alemania.
• Giacobbe, G. (1972a). Francesco Barozzi e la quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. Physis, Rivista Internazionale Di Storia Della Scienza, XIV(4).
• Giacobbe, G. (1972b). Il Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum di Alessandro Piccolomini. Physis, Rivista Internazionale Di Storia Della Scienza, XIV(2).
• Giacobbe, G. (1972c). La quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum all’interno della Scuola Padovana. In Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica, Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze.
• Giacobbe, G. (1973). Alcune cinquecentine riguardanti il processo di rivalutazione epistemologica della matematica nell’ambito della rivoluzione scientifica rinascimentale. La Berio, Bollettino Bibliografico Quadrimestrale, XIII(2–3).
• Giacobbe, G. (1976). Epigoni nel Seicento della quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum: Giuseppe Biancani. Physis, Rivista Internazionale Di Storia Della Scienza, XVIII(1).
• Giacobbe, G. (1977). Un gesuita progressista nella quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum rinascimentale: Benito Pereyra. Physis, Rivista Internazionale Di Storia Della Scienza, XIX(2).
• Hahn, A. J. (2002). The Pendulum Swings Again: A Mathematical Reassessment of Galileo’s Experiments with Inclined Planes. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 56(4), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070200048
• Henry, J. (2011). Galileo and the scientific revolution: The importance of his kinematics. Galileana, XVIII, 3–36.
• Jardine, N. (1988). Epistemology of the Sciences. In C. B. Schmitt, Q. Skinner, & E. Kessler (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (pp. 685–711). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jesseph, D. M. (1999). Squaring the Circle: The War Between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Koyré, A. (1966). Études galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.
• Machamer, P. (1978). Galileo and the Causes. In New Perspectives on Galileo (Vol. 14, pp. 161–180). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-9799-8_5#close
• Machamer, P. (1998). Galileo’s machines, his mathematics and his experiments. In The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (pp. 53–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Machamer, P., & Woody, A. (1994). A model of intelligibility in science: Using Galileo’s balance as a model for understanding the motion of bodies. Science & Education, 3(3), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540155
• Mancosu, P. (1992). Aristotelian logic and Euclidean mathematics: Seventeenth-century developments of the Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 23(2), 241–265.
• Martínez, S., & Huang, X. (2011). Introducción: Hacia una filosofía de la ciencia centrada en prácticas. In Historia, prácticas y estilos en la filosofía de la ciencia. Hacia una epistemología plural. (pp. 5–63). México: UAM-Iztapalapa y Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
• Naylor, R. H. (1974). Galileo and the Problem of Free Fall. The British Journal for the History of Science, 7(2), 105–134.
• Naylor, R. H. (1977). Galileo’s theory of motion: Processes of conceptual change in the period 1604–1610. Annals of Science, 34(4), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797700200281
• Naylor, R. H. (1982). Galileo’s law of fall: Absolute truth or approximation. Annals of Science, 39(4), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798200200491
• Ochoa, F. (2013). De la subordinación a la hegemonía. Sobre la legitimación epistemológica de las matemáticas en la filosofía natural en el siglo XVII. Revista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 13(25), 125–176.
• Pereira, B. (1591). De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis & affectionibus: Libri XV. Venetijs,Úndream Muschium.
• Piccolomini, A. (1565). Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum in his Alexandri Piccolominei In mechanicas quaestiones Aristotelis, paraphrasis paulo quidem plenior. Eiusdem commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum: in quo, de resolutione, diffinitione & demonstratione: necnon de materia, & in fine logicae facultatis, quamplura continentur ad rem ipsam, tum mathematicam, tum logicam, maxime pertinentia. Venice: Apud Traianum Curtium.
• Remmert, T. (2005). Galileo, God and Mathematics. In Mathematics and the Divine: A Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Rodríguez, L. D., & Romero, Á. (2014). Desarrollos galileanos en el campo de la estática: una posible contribución a la enseñanza. Revista Física Y Cultura, 1(5). Retrieved from http://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RFC/article/view/2602
• Romo, J. (1985). La física de Galileo. La problemática en torno a la ley caída de los cuerpos. Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona.
• Roux, S. (2010). Forms of Mathematization (14th-17th Centuries). Early Science and Medicine, (15), 319–337.
• Salvia, S. (2014). Galileo’s Machine: Late Notes on Free Fall, Projectile Motion, and the Force of Percussion (ca. 1638–1639). Physics in Perspective, 16(4), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-014-0149-1
• Schaffer, S. (1988). Wallifaction: Thomas Hobbes on school divinity and experimental pneumatics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 19(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(88)90001-5
• Schöttler, T. (2012). From Causes to Relations: The Emergence of a Non-Aristotelian Concept of Geometrical Proof out of the Quaestio de Certitudine Mathematicarum. Societate Si Politica, 6(2), 29–47.
• Shea, W. (1998). Galileo’s Copernicanism: the science and the rethoric. In The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (pp. 211–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Swerdlow, N. (1998). Galileo’s discoveries with the telescope and their evidence for the Copernican theory. In The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (pp. 244–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Dyck, M. (2006). An archaeology of Galileo’s science of motion. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
• Velilla, H. (2015a). El debate sobre la certeza de las matemáticas en la filosofía natural de los siglos XVI y XVII (De quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum). Saga - revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía, 16(28), 12–25.
• Velilla, H. (2015b). Las matemáticas de los siglos XVI y XVII en la historiografía científica contemporánea. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de La Ciencia, 15(31), 83–104.
• Wisan, W. (1974). The new science of motion: A study of Galileo’s De motu locali. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13(2–3), 103–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327483
• Wisan, W. (1977). Mathematics and Experiment in Galileo’s Science of Motion. Annali dell'Istituto E Museo Di Storia Della Scienza Di Firenze, 2(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1163/221058777X01361