El contrato de maternidad subrogadaLa experiencia estadounidense
- Camilo A Rodríguez-Yong
- Karol Ximena Martínez-Muñoz
ISSN: 0716-9132, 0718-0950
Année de publication: 2012
Volumen: 25
Número: 2
Pages: 59-81
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Revista de Derecho
Résumé
The article has the purpose of identifying and presenting the United States experience regarding the contract on surrogate motherhood. This experience has the following main features: a) there is a regulation of the contract founded in the law and case law, b) there is no uniform position among the states regarding the legal enforceability of the contract, c) public policy and family law are used to determine the legal validity of the agreement, and d) the regulation of the contract is directed to counter the negative effects of contract. Likewise, the article wants to identify the common points between the U.S´s vision and the Colombian.
Références bibliographiques
- Abraham. Behm, L. L. (1999). Legal, Moral & International Perspectives on Surrogate Motherhood: the Call for a Uniform Regulatory Scheme in the United States. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law. DePaul University. 3.
- Cohen, B. (1984). Surrogate Mothers: Whose Baby Is It?. American Journal of Law & Medicine. University School of Law. Boston. 3.
- Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Surrogacy Contracts in the 1990's: The Controversy and Debate Continues. Duquesne Law Review. Duquesne University. 4.
- Gallee, C. L. (1992). Surrogate Mother Contracts: A View of Recent Legislative Approaches. Journal of Health Law. American Health Law Associations. 6.
- Gugucheva, M. (2010). Surrogacy in America, Council for Responsible Genetics.
- Jadva, V, Murray, C, Lycett, E, Maccallum, F, Golombok, S. (2003). Surrogacy: the Experiences of Surrogate Mothers. Human Reproduction. Oxford University Press. 10.
- Lascarides, D. E. (1997). A Plea for the Enforceability of Gestational Surrogacy Contracts. Hofstra Law Review. Hofstra University. 4.
- Marín Vélez, G. A. (2003). El arrendamiento de vientre en Colombia. Opinión Jurídica. Sello editorial Universidad de Medellín. 3.
- McLachlan, H. V, Swales, J. K. (2009). Show Me the Money: Making Markets in Forbidden Exchange: Commercial Surrogate Motherhood and the Alleged Commodification of Children: a Defense of Legally Enforceable Contracts. Law and Contemporary Problems. Duke University. 3.
- Medina, J. E. (2010). Derecho Civil Derecho de Familia. 2ª. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
- Spivack, C. (2010). The Law of Surrogate Motherhood in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law. American Society of Comparative Law.
- Tiller, S. L. (1987). Litigation, Legislation, and Limelight: Obstacles to Commercial Surrogate Mother Arrangements. Iowa Law Review. Iowa University. 2.
- Van Den Akker, O. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update. Oxford University Press. 1.
- Cynthia, Moschetta. (1994). 25 Cal. App. 4th 1218.
- Doe. (1992). 194 Mich. App. 432.
- Hawkins, Frye. (1988). 1988 Del. Fam. Ct. LEXIS 31.
- Johnson, Calvert. (1993). 5 Cal. 4th 84.
- (03/0). Sentencia C-145/10, M.P.
- (18/1). Sentencia T-968/09, M.P.