Caracterización de la autoeficacia de futuros profesores de Matemáticas de educación secundaria

  1. Chamoso-Sánchez, José María 1
  2. Diego-Mantecón, José Manuel 2
  3. Rodríguez-Sánchez, María Mercedes 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidad de Cantabria
    info

    Universidad de Cantabria

    Santander, España

    ROR https://ror.org/046ffzj20

Revista:
Uniciencia

ISSN: 2215-3470

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Uniciencia. January-December, 2024

Volumen: 38

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15359/RU.38-1.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Uniciencia

Resumen

[Objetivo] El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la autoeficacia de futuros profesores de Matemáticas de Secundaria al finalizar su formación inicial docente. [Metodología] La muestra fueron 98 futuros profesores de Matemáticas de Secundaria que cursaban el Máster Universitario en Profesor de Educación Secundaria. Los datos fueron sus reflexiones escritas, que se organizaron en unidades de información y se clasificaron atendiendo a las cinco fuentes de autoeficacia que recoge la literatura especializada: conocimiento profesional; práctica de aula; estados fisiológicos, afectivos y motivacionales; cooperación con colegas y padres; y experiencia. Posteriormente, un análisis de contenido permitió identificar tópicos comunes entre ellas. [Resultados] Los resultados evidencian una autoeficacia docente todavía en formación, lejos de la que cabría esperar en docentes que finalizan su periodo de formación inicial. Destaca la necesidad de incrementar la confianza de los futuros docentes en sus habilidades para traducir el conocimiento del contenido en aprendizajes de los alumnos, para implementar diferentes estrategias de enseñanza y, especialmente, de incrementar su confianza en sus habilidades emocionales. [Conclusiones] Los resultados proporcionan una valiosa información a los programas de formación de docentes al indicar el estado en el que se encuentra la autoeficacia docente al finalizar el periodo de formación inicial. Además, se proporciona una herramienta para analizar la autoeficacia docente de futuros profesores de Matemáticas de Secundaria. Todo ello abre futuras líneas de investigación en diversos sentidos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. y Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt y Co.
  • Bjerke, A. H. y Eriksen, E. (2016). Measuring pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in tutoring children in primary mathematics: an instrument. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1141312
  • Bjerke, A. H. y Solomon, Y. (2020). Developing self-efficacy in teaching mathematics: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the role of subject knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 692-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595720
  • Boz, Y. y Boz, N. (2010). The nature of the relationship between teaching concerns and sense of efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.490910
  • Chamoso, J. M. y Cáceres, M. J. (2009). Analysis of the reflections of student-teachers of Mathematics when working with learning portfolios in Spanish university classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.007
  • Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N. y Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers' efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9084-2
  • Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F. y Ellett, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010
  • Flores, M. A. y Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
  • Glackin, M. y Hohenstein, J. (2018). Teachers’ self-efficacy: progressing qualitative analysis. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 41(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295940
  • Han, J. y Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
  • Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2016). A longitudinal study on mathematics teaching efficacy: Which factors (un)support the development? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2085-2102. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1277a
  • Katz, S. y Stupel, M. (2016). Enhancing elementary-school mathematics teachers’ efficacy beliefs: a qualitative action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1080314
  • Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M. y Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998-2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
  • Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Teacher efficacy in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.007
  • Marschall, G. (2022). The role of teacher identity in teacher self-efficacy development: the case of Katie. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25, 725-747. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.90355
  • Meristo, M., Ljalikova, A. y Löfström, E. (2013). Looking back on experienced teachers’ reflections: how did pre-service school practice support the development of self-efficacy? European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.805409
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
  • Polizzi, S. J., Zhu, Y., Reid, J. W., Ofem, B., Salisbury, S., Beeth, M., & Rushton, G. T. (2021). Science and mathematics teacher communities of practice: social influences on discipline-based identity and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00275-2
  • Salomón, Mª. S., Chamoso, J. Mª., Diego, J. M., Rodríguez, Mª. M., Sánchez, B., Cáceres, Mª. J. y González, Mª. T. (2018). Conocimiento profesional y práctica de aula del profesor de Matemáticas: la recta de Euler. En Junta de Castilla y León (Eds.), XIV Congreso Regional de Matemáticas de Castilla y León (pp. 230-238). JCYL.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Skaalvik, E. M. y Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
  • Skaalvik, E. M. y Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
  • Timoštšuk, I. y Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1563-1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.008
  • Thomson, M. M., Gray, D., Walkowiak, T. A. y Alnizami, R. (2022). Developmental Trajectories for Novice Elementary Teachers: Teaching Efficacy and Mathematics Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(4), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211014128
  • Toe, D. M. y Longaretti, L. (2022). Teacher Efficacy in High Performing Teachers: Barriers and Enablers for New Graduates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n4.1
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. y Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  • Wang, L. Y., Jen-Yi, L., Tan, L. S., Tan, I., Lim, X. F. y Wu, B. S. (2016). Unpacking high and low efficacy teachers’ task analysis and competence assessment in teaching low-achieving students in secondary schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0196-x
  • Watson, S. y Marschall, G. (2019). How a trainee mathematics teacher develops teacher self-efficacy. Teacher Development, 23(4), 469-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1633392
  • Webb, D. L. y LoFaro, K. P. (2020). Sources of engineering teaching self‐efficacy in a STEAM methods course for elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 120(4), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12403
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet