Evaluación de actitudes de los profesionales hacia las personas con discapacidad

  1. ARIAS GONZÁLEZ, Víctor 1
  2. ARIAS MARTÍNEZ, Benito 3
  3. VERDUGO ALONSO, Miguel Ángel 2
  4. RUBIA AVI, Mariano 3
  5. JENARO RÍO, Cristina 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Talca
    info

    Universidad de Talca

    Talca, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/01s4gpq44

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  3. 3 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Siglo Cero: Revista Española sobre Discapacidad Intelectual

ISSN: 2530-0350

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 47

Número: 2

Páginas: 7-41

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14201/SCERO2016472741 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Siglo Cero: Revista Española sobre Discapacidad Intelectual

Resumen

El propósito principal de este estudio ha sido la construcción y validación de una escala de actitudes hacia las personas con discapacidad, dirigida preferentemente a profesionales de las áreas de la salud y la educación. Han participado 976 profesionales de diferentes ámbitos (sanidad, educación, orientación laboral, medios de comunicación, administración), con un rango de edad entre 18 y 65 años. El 49.1% fueron mujeres. Se han realizado análisis de concordancia entre jueces expertos para valorar el contenido de los ítems, y se han sometido los datos a tres clases de análisis: comparación de estructuras de correlación, análisis factorial exploratorio con método de factor común y análisis factorial confirmatorio. Se han comparado dos modelos: unifactorial y de tres factores correlacionados. Los resultados han evidenciado buenas cualidades métricas de fiabilidad (consistencia interna, fiabilidad de los indicadores individuales, fiabilidad de constructo y error típico de medida) y de validez (de contenido, convergente y discriminante).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AKRAMI, N., EKEHAMMER, B., CLAESSON, M. Y SONNANDER, K. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 605-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.003
  • ALI, A., STRYDOM, A., HASSIOTIS, A., WILLIAMS, R. Y KING, M. (2008). A measure of perceived stigma in people with intellectual disability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 193 (5), 410-415.
  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA) y National council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045823
  • ANTONAK, R. F. (1979). An orderic-theoretic analysis of attitudes toward disabled persons. Rehabilitation Psychology, 26, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090918
  • ANTONAK, R. F. (1981). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons (Technical Report n. º 1). Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Education Department.
  • ANTONAK, R. F. (1985). Construct validation of the Scale of Attitudes toward Disabled Persons. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 16 (1), 7-10.
  • ANTONAK, R. F. Y LIVNEH, H. (1994). Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 3-24.
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.40.1.3
  • ANTONAK, R. F. Y LIVNEH, H. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296782
  • ANTONAK, R. F. Y RANKIN, P. R. (1982). Measurement and analysis of knowledge and attitudes about epilepsy and persons with epilepsy. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 1591-1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90170-8
  • ARIAS, B. (1993). Evaluación de actitudes hacia la integración de alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales (Tesis doctoral no publicada). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
  • ARIAS, B. Y MORENTIN, R. (2004). Opiniones y actitudes de las familias de personas con discapacidad en Castilla y León. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León.
  • ARIAS, B., VERDUGO, M. Á. Y RUBIO, V. J. (1995). Evaluación de la Actividad Modelo Local de Valladolid. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
  • ASPAROUHOV, T. Y MUTHÉN, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397-438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204.
  • BAGLEY, M. T. Y GREENE, J. F. (1981). Peer attitudes toward the handicapped. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • BAILEY, A., BARR, O. Y BUNTING, B. (2001). Police attitudes toward people with intellectual disability: An evaluation of awareness training. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 344-350. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00339.x.
  • BANGDIWALA, K. (1987). Using SAS software graphical procedures for the observer agreement chart. Proceedings of the SAS User’s Group International Conference, 12, 1083-1088.
  • BARTLETT, C. J., QUAY, L. C. Y WRIGHTSMAN, L. S. (1960). A comparison of two methods of attitude measurement: Likert-type and forced choice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000405
  • BEAUDUCEL, A. Y HERZBERG, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13 (2), 186-203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.
  • BERRYMAN, J. D. Y NEAL, W. R. (1980). The cross validation of the Attitudes Toward Mainstreaming Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000227
  • BIGBY, C., CLEMENT, T., MANSELL, J. Y BEADLE-BROWN, J. (2009). ‘It’s pretty hard with our ones, they can’t talk, the more able bodied can participate’: Staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 363-376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x.
  • BOHNER, G. Y WÄNKE, M. (2014). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • BRECKLER, S. J. Y WIGGINS, E. C. (1992). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. En A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler y A. C. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 407-427). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • BROWNE, M. W. Y CUDECK, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005.
  • BRUNNER, M., NAGY, G. Y WILHELM, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80 (4), 796-846. doi:10.1080/10107013051070418.
  • CAMPBELL, J. M. (2008). Brief report: reliability and validity of the Shared Activities Questionnaire as a measure of middle school students’ attitudes toward autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 38, 1598-1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0534-6
  • CANIMAS, J. (2015). ¿Discapacidad o diversidad funcional? Siglo Cero, 46 (2), 79-97. http:// dx.doi.org/10.14201/scero20154627997.
  • CHADD, E. H. Y PANGILINAN, P. H. (2011). Disability attitudes in health care: a new scale instrument. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 90 (1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182017269
  • CHEN, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
  • CHEUNG, G. W. y RENSVOLD, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • CLAYFIELD, J. C., FLETCHER, K. E. y GRUDZINKAS, A. J. (2011). Development and validation of the mental health attitude survey for police. Community Mental Health, 47 (6), 742-751.
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-011-9384-y
  • COHEN, J. S. Y STRUENING, E. L. (1959). Factors underlying opinions about mental illness in the personnel of a large mental hospital. American Psychologist, 14, 339.
  • COHEN, J. S. Y STRUENING, E. L. (1960). Attitudes toward the mental ill of psychiatric hospital personnel as a function of occupation, education, age and sex. American Psychologist, 15, 417. Cohen, J. S. y Struening, E. L. (1962). Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045526
  • COOPER, A., ROSE, J. Y MASON, O. (2004). Measuring the attitudes of human service professionals toward deafness. American Annals of Deafness, 148 (5), 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2004.0001
  • COWEN, E. L., BOBROVE, P. H., ROCKWAY, A. M. Y STEVENSON, J. (1967). Development and evaluation of an attitude to deafness scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6 (2), 297-304.
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024552
  • COWEN, E. L., UNDERBERG, R. P. Y VERILLO, R. T. (1958). The development and testing of an attitude to blindness scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1958.9919294
  • EAGLY, A. Y CHAIKEN, S. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude structure and resistance to change. En R. PETTY AND J. KOSNIK (Eds.), Attitude Strength (pp. 413-432). MAHWAH, NJ: ERLBAUM. EDWARDS, N., LENNOX, N. Y WHITE, P. (2007). Queensland psychiatrists’ attitudes and perceptions of adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 75-81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00870.x.
  • EFRON, R. E. Y EFRON, H. Y. (1967). Measurement of attitudes toward the retarded and an application with educators. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 100-106.
  • ESPOSITO, B. G. Y PEACH, W. J. (1983). Changing attitudes of preschool children toward handicapped persons. Exceptional Children, 49 (4), 361-363.
  • FELLINGHAUER, B., ROTH, A., BUGARI, K. Y REINHARDT, J. (2011). Construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential scale (Pesd) in disability studies. Journal of Developmental Physical Disabilies, 23, 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-010-9224-y
  • FIEDLER, C. Y SIMPSON, R. (1987). Modifyint the attitudes of non-handicapped high school students toward handicapped peers. Exceptional Children, 19, 342-349.
  • FINDLER, L., VILCHINSKY, N. Y WERNER, S. (2007). The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities (MAS): construction and validation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50 (3), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552070500030401
  • FORGAS, J. P., COOPER, J. Y CRANO, W. D. (2010). The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change. New York: Psychology Press.
  • FORNELL, C. Y LARCKER, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • GADERMANN, A. M., GUHN, M. Y ZUMBO, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likerttype and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17 (3), 1-13.
  • GAN, J., TYMCHUK, A. J. y NISHIHARA, A. (1977). Mildly retarded adults: their attitudes toward retardation. Mental Retardation, 15, 5-9.
  • GILBERT, D. C. Y LEVINSON, D. J. (1956). Ideology, personality, and institutional policy in the mental hospital. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53 (3), 263-271.
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041987
  • GRAHAM, S., HERBERT, R., PRICE, S. Y WILLIAMS, S. (2004). Attitudes and emotions of trainees in learning disability psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 254-256. doi:10.1192/pb.28.7.254.
  • GRAND, S. A., BERNIER, J. E. Y STROHMER, D. C. (1982). Attitudes toward disabled persons as a function of social context and specific disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 27, 165-174.
  • GROOMES, D. Y LINKOWSKI, D. (2007). Examining the structure of the revised acceptance disability scale. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73 (3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.28.7.254
  • HAIR, J. F., BLACK, W. C., BABIN, B. J. Y ANDERSON, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th. ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • HAMPTON, N. Y XIAO, F. (2007). Attitudes toward people with developmental disabilities in Chinese and American students: The role of cultural values, contact, and knowledges. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 73 (4). Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/ mi_m0825/is_4_73/ai_n24354968/?tag=content;col1.
  • HAMPTON, N. Y XIAO, F. (2008). Psychometric properties of the mental retardation attitude Inventory-revised in Chinese college students. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52 (4), 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01020.x
  • HARTH, R. (1974). Attitudes and mental retardation. A review of literature. Training School Bulletin, 69, 150-164.
  • HATTON, C., AKRAM, Y., ROBERTSON, J., SHAH, R. Y EMERSON, E. (2003). The disclosure process and its impact on South Asian families with a child with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16 (3), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00167.x
  • HENRY, D., KEYS, C., JOPP, F. Y BALCAZAR, F. (1996). The Community Living Attitudes Scale, mental retardation form: development and psychometric properties. Mental Retardation, 34 (3), 149-158.
  • HORNE, M. D. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer, and parent reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • HU, L. y BENTLER, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • JENNRICH, R. I. Y BENTLER, P. M. (2011). Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 76, 537-549. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9218-4.
  • JENNRICH, R. I. Y BENTLER, P. M. (2012). Exploratory bi-factor analysis: The oblique case. Psychometrika, 77, 442-454. doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9269-1.
  • JÖRESKOG, K. G. Y SÖRBOM, D. (1993). Lisrel user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • KASSAM, A., GLOZIER, N., LEESE, M., HENDERSON, C. Y THOMICROFT, G. (2010). Development and responsiveness of a scale to measure clinicians’ attitudes to people with mental illness (medical student version). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122 (2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01562.x
  • KIERTSCH, M. S., HANSON, P. L. Y DUHOUX, M. A. (1980). Preparing the mainstream: Changing children’s attitudes toward the disabled. School Psychology Review, 9 (3), 279-283.
  • LANGEVIN, M. Y HAGLER, P. (2004). Development of a scale to measure peer attitudes toward children who stutter. En A. Bothe (Ed.), Evidence-based Treatment of Stuttering: Empirical Bases and Clinical Applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • LARRIVEE, B. Y COOK, L. (1979). Mainstreaming: A study of the variables affecting teacher attitudes. Journal of Special Education, 13 (3), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697901300310
  • LAZAR, A. L., GENSLEY, J. T. Y ORPET, R. E. (1971). Changing attitudes of young gifted children toward handicapped persons. Exceptional Children, 37, 600-602.
  • LIDSLEY, J. D. Y FRITH, G. H. (1983). The effects of nonhandicapped students’ personal characteristics on their attitude toward handicapped peers. Journal for Special Educators, 20, 64-69. LILIENFELD, M. Y ALANT, E. (2002). Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output. Augmentative Alternative Communication, 18, 91-101.
  • LIVNEH, H. (1985). Factor structure of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: A replication. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 53-58.
  • LOMBARDI, A. R. Y MURRAY, C. (2011). Measuring university faculty attitudes toward disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt Universal Design principles. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 43-56. doi:10.3233/JVR-2010-0533.
  • MARSH, V. Y FRIEDMAN, R. (1972). Changing public attitudes toward blindness. Exceptional Children, 38, 426-428.
  • MCDONALD, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York: Psychology Press.
  • MILLER, M., ARMSTRONG, S. Y HAGAN, M. (1981). Effects on teaching on elementary students’ attitudes toward handicapped. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 110-113.
  • Morin, D., Crocker, G., Beaulieu-Bergeron, R. Y Caron, J. (2013). Validation of the attitudes toward intellectual disability e ATTID questionnaire. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57 (3), 268-278.
  • NUNNALLY, J. C. (1961). Popular conceptions of mental health: their development and change. New York: Hol, Rinehart and Winston.
  • OSTAPCZUK, M. Y MUSCH, J. (2011). Estimating the prevalence of negative attitudes towards people with disability: A comparison of direct questioning, projective questioning and randomised response. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 33, 399-411. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.492067.
  • PARISH, T. S. Y COPELAND, T. F. (1978). Teachers’ and students’ attitudes in mainstreamed classrooms. Psychological Reports, 43 (1), 54.
  • POPOVICH, P. M., SCHERBAUM, C. A., SCHERBAUM, K. L. Y POLINKO, N. (2003). The assessment of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities in the workplace. Journal of Psychology, 137 (2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600606
  • POWER, M. J., GREEN, A. M., CATCHPOLE, C. ET AL. (2010). The Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS): development and psychometric properties. Journal of Intellectual Disability, 54 (9), 860-874.
  • Pruett, S. y chAn, F. (2006). Development and psychometric validation of the disability attitude implicit association test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51 (3), 202-213.
  • R CORE TEAM (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
  • REISE, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47 (5), 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
  • REISE, S. P., SCHEINES, R., WIDAMAN, K. Y HAVILAND, M. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: a bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73 (1), 5-26.
  • RELLO, C. F., GAROZ, I. Y DÍAZ, M. (2014). Determinantes de las técnicas de cambio de actitudes hacia la discapacidad en programas educativos: una revisión internacional. Siglo Cero, 45 (3), 28-46.
  • REYNOLDS, W. M. Y GRECO, V. T. (1980). The reliability and factorial validity of a scale for measuring teachers’ attitudes toward mainstreaming. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000226
  • ROSENBAUM, P., ARMSTRONG, R. Y KING, S. (1985). Children’s attitudes toward disabled peers: a self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11 (4), 517-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/11.4.517
  • RUCKER, C. Y GABLE, R. (1974). The Rucker-Gable Educational Programming Scale. Storrs, CT: Rucker-Gable Associates.
  • Saunders, G. H., Cienkowski, K. M., Forsline, A. Y Fausti, S. (2005). Normative data for the attitudes towards loss of hearing questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16 (9), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.9.2
  • SCHMELKIN, L. P. (1981). Teachers’ and non-teachers’ attitudes toward mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 48, 42-47.
  • SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL (2013). LISREL (Version 9.3) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • SCIOR, K. (2011). Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32 (6), 2164-2182.
  • SCIOR, K. Y FURNHAM, A. (2011). Development and validation of the Intellectual Disability Literacy Scale for assessment of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes to intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1530-1541. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.044.
  • SCIOR, K. Y WERNER, S. (2015). Changing attitudes to learning disability: A review of the evidence. Jerusalem: Mencap.
  • SEO, H., LITTLE, T. D., SHOGREN, K. A. Y LANG, K. M. (in press). On the benefits of latent variable modeling for norming scales: The case of the Supports Intensity Scale – Children’s version. International Journal of Behavioral Development. doi:10.1177/0165025415591230.
  • SILLER, J., FERGUSON, L. T., VANN, D. H. Y HOLLAND, B. (1967). Structure of attitudes toward the physically disabled: The Disability Factor Scales Amputation, Blindness, Cosmetic Conditions. Studies in Reaction to Disability: XII. New York: New York University School of Education.
  • SYMONS, A. B., FISH, R., MCGUIGAN, D., FOX, J. Y AKL, E. A. (2012). Development of an instrument to measure medical students’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilies, 50 (3), 251-260.
  • TACHIBANA, T. Y WATANABE, K. (2003). Schemata and attitude toward persons with intellectual disability in Japan. Psychological Reports, 93, 1161-1172.
  • TACHIBANA, T. Y WATANABE, K. (2004). Attitudes of Japanese adults toward persons with intellectual disability: Relationship between attitudes and demographic variables. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 109-126.
  • TAYLOR, R. L. (2008). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • TAYLOR, S. Y DEAR, M. (1981). Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 7 (2), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/7.2.225
  • THOMAS, A., PALMER, J., COKER-JUNEAU, C. Y WILLIAMS, D. (2002). Factor structure and construct validity of the interaction with disabled persons scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63 (3), 465-483.
  • TIMMERMAN, M. E. Y LORENZO-SEVA, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16 (2), 209.
  • TOWFIGHY-HOSHYAR, N. Y ZINGLE, H. W. (1984). Regular class students’ attitudes toward integrated multiply handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88 (6), 630-637.
  • TRIANDIS, H. C. (1971). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • TRINGO, J. L. (1970). The hierarchy of preferences toward disability groups. Journal of Special Education, 4, 295-306.
  • UPTON, T. D. Y HARPER, D. C. (2002). Multidimensional disability attitudes and equitable evaluation of educational accommodations in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15 (2), 115-130.
  • VERDUGO, M. Á., ARIAS, B. Y JENARO, C. (1994). Actitudes hacia las personas con minusvalía. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales.
  • VERDUGO, M. Á., JENARO, C. Y ARIAS, B. (1995). Actitudes sociales y profesionales hacia las personas con discapacidad: estrategias de evaluación e intervención. En M. Á. Verdugo (Dir.), Personas con discapacidad: perspectivas psicopedagógicas y rehabilitadoras (pp. 79143). México: Siglo XXI.
  • VOELTZ, L. M. (1980). Effects of structured interactions with severely handicapped peers to children’s attitudes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86 (4), 380-390.
  • VON EYE, A. Y MUN, E. Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement: Manifest variable methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • WIDAMAN, K. F., LITTLE, T. D., PREACHER, K. J. Y SAWALANI, G. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. En K. H. TRZESNIEWSKI, M. B. DONNELLAN Y R. E. LUCAS (Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39-61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • WILLEMS, A., EMBREGTS, P., STAMS, G. Y MOONEN, X. (2010). The relation between intrapersonal and interpersonal staff behaviour towards clients with ID and challenging behaviour: a validation study of the Staff-Client Interactive Behaviour Inventory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 40-51.
  • WILLIAMS, R. Y ROSE, J. (2007). The development of a questionnaire to assess the perceptions of care staff towards people with intellectual disabilities who display challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability, 11 (2), 197-211.
  • WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (2011). World Report on Disability 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization Press.
  • YUKER, H. E., BLOCK, J. R. Y YOUNNG, J. H. (1960). The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
  • ZINBARG, R. E., REVELLE, W., YOVEL, I. Y LI, W. (2005). Cronbach’s ?, Revelle’s b, and McDonald’s ?H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7