Unas fechas antiguas no hacen una nueva arqueologíala necesidad de integrar métodos arqueométricos y arqueológicos en los estudios de arte rupestre

  1. Randall White 1
  2. Gerhard Bosinski
  3. Raphaëlle Bourrillon
  4. Jean Clottes
  5. Margaret W. Conkey 2
  6. María Soledad Corchón Rodríguez 3
  7. Miguel Cortés Sánchez 4
  8. Marco de la Rasilla Vives 5
  9. Brigitte Delluc 6
  10. Gilles Delluc 6
  11. Valérie Feruglio 7
  12. Harald Floss 8
  13. Pascal Foucher 9
  14. Carole Fritz 10
  15. Oscar Fuentes 11
  16. Diego Gárate Maidagán 12
  17. Jesús Antonio González Gómez
  18. Manuel R. González Morales 12
  19. María González-Pumariega Solís 13
  20. Marc Groenen 14
  21. Jacques Jaubert 15
  22. Elena Man Estier 16
  23. María Aránzazu Martínez Aguirre 4
  24. Patrick Paillet 17
  25. Romain Pigeaud 16
  26. Stéphane Petrognani 17
  27. Geneviève Pinçon 18
  28. Frédéric Plassard 15
  29. Sergio Ripoll López 19
  30. Olivia Rivero Vilá 3
  31. Eric Robert 17
  32. Juan Francisco Ruiz López 20
  33. Cristina San Juan-Foucher 9
  34. José Luis Sanchidrián Torti 21
  35. Georges Sauvet 10
  36. María Dolores Simón Vallejo 22
  37. Gilles Tosello 9
  38. Denis Vialou 17
  39. Agueda Vilhena Vialou 17
  40. Mark Willis 23
  41. Show all authors +
  1. 1 New York University
    info

    New York University

    Nueva York, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/0190ak572

  2. 2 University of California (United States of América)
  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  4. 4 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  5. 5 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  6. 6 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris (France)
  7. 7 Université de Bordeau (France)
  8. 8 University of Tübingen
    info

    University of Tübingen

    Tubinga, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kwz48

  9. 9 Université de Toulouse
    info

    Université de Toulouse

    Tolosa, Francia

  10. 10 Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities
    info

    Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities

    Nancy, Francia

    ROR https://ror.org/01petg633

  11. 11 Universidad de París X Nanterre (France)
  12. 12 Universidad de Cantabria
    info

    Universidad de Cantabria

    Santander, España

    ROR https://ror.org/046ffzj20

  13. 13 Consejería de Educación y Cultura del Principado de Asturias (España)
  14. 14 Université Libre de Bruxelles
    info

    Université Libre de Bruxelles

    Bruselas, Bélgica

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9htc13

  15. 15 University of Bordeaux
    info

    University of Bordeaux

    Burdeos, Francia

    ROR https://ror.org/057qpr032

  16. 16 Université de Rennes 1 (France)
  17. 17 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (France)
  18. 18 Centre national de Préhistoire.Ministère de la culture (France)
  19. 19 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  20. 20 Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
    info

    Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

    Ciudad Real, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05r78ng12

  21. 21 Universidad de Córdoba
    info

    Universidad de Córdoba

    Córdoba, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05yc77b46

  22. 22 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  23. 23 Flinders University
    info

    Flinders University

    Adelaida, Australia

    ROR https://ror.org/01kpzv902

Show affiliations +
Journal:
Nailos: Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología

ISSN: 2340-9126

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 6

Pages: 17-28

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Nailos: Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología

bar_chart View metrics

Metrics

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2019
  • Journal Impact: 0.090
  • Field: HISTORIA Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 168/312
  • Field: ARQUEOLOGÍA Y PREHISTORIA Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 37/62

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: D
    •
  • Human Sciences: C
    •

Abstract

An international group of archaeologists specializing in cave art explain the diffi-culties they faced to publish their response to another paper, previously published in Science (Hoffmann et al. 2018), reporting a Neanderthal origin of some Spanish cave pain-tings according to Uranium-thorium method. In their reply, they underlined the diffe-rent sources of error that lead to overestimate the dates and summarized the contra-dictions with archeological arguments. Some American reviewers put more trust in ar-cheometry than in European arqueology, which is unfamiliar to them. Thus, the paper passed through the hands of many reviewers and it took more than one year to finally publish it in Journal of Human Evolution. This whole process illustrates the lack of trans-parency in peer review procedures -although apparently objective and neutral- when renowned authors are concerned.

Data source: Dialnet