Disposiciones y puntos de vista causales

  1. Álvarez Toledo, Sebastián 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca, España
Revista:
Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía

ISSN: 1130-0507 1989-4651

Ano de publicación: 2018

Título do exemplar: Puntos de Vista

Número: 75

Páxinas: 27-41

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/DAIMON/332161 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía

Resumo

This paper is mainly about the ontological signification of dispositional properties, and in order to uphold the causal efficacy of dispositions, it highlights the differences between two points of view on causation: that of efficient causation, which is the usual one, and that corresponding to structural causation. The conclusion is that dispositions are structural causes. However, although both points of view on causation are just different and complement each other, some meaningful conflicts arise between them.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Armstrong, D. M. (1968), A Materialist Theory of Mind, rev. edn, 1993, London: Routledge.
  • Armstrong, D. M. (1996), «Categoricalist Versus Dispositionalist Accounts of Properties», Acta Analytica, 15, pp. 7–19.
  • Armstrong, D. M. (1997), A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bird, A, (2007), Nature´s Metaphysics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Boyd, R. (1991), «Realism, Anti-Foundationism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds», Philosophical Studies, 61, pp. 127-148.
  • Boyd, R. (1999), «Homeostasis, species and higher taxes», in: R. A. Wilson (ed.): Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 142–185.
  • Carnap, R. (1936), «Testability and Meaning», Part I, Philosophy of Science, 3, pp. 420–471.
  • Cartwright, N. (1989), Nature’s Capacities and their Measurements, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cartwright, N. and Pemberton, J. (2013), «Aristotelian Powers. Without Them, What Would Modern Sciencie do?», in: R. Groff and J. Greco (eds.) (2013), pp. 93-112.
  • Chakravartty, A. (2013), «Dispositions for Scientific Realism», in: R. Groff and J. Greco (eds.) (2013), pp. 113-126.
  • Choi, S. and Fara, M. (2016), «Dispositions», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/dispositions/>.
  • Cummins, R. (1974), «Dispositions, States and Causes”, Analysis, 34, pp. 194-204.
  • García Encinas, M. J. (2011), «Singular Causation Without Disposition», Theoria, 26:70, pp. 35-50.
  • Groff, R. and Greco, J (eds.) (2013), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy. The New Aristotelism, New York: Routledge.
  • Hume, D. (1739-1740), Treatise on Human Nature. D. F. Norton and M. J. Norton (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Hume, D. (1772), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. T. Beauchamp (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • Joy, L. (2013), «The Ineliminability of Dispositions in Hume’s Rejection of Causal Powers», in: R. Groff and J. Greco (eds.) (2013), pp. 69-90.
  • Liz, M. (2013), «Analizando la noción de puntos de vista», en: M. Liz (ed.): Puntos de vista. Una investigación filosófica, Barcelona: Laertes, pp. 25-164.
  • Liz, M. and Vázquez, M. (2015), «Subjective and Objective Aspects of Points of View», in: M. Vázquez and M. Liz (eds.): Temporal Points of View, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015, pp. 59-104.
  • Mach, E. (1883), Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargestellt. Leibzig: Brockhaus. English translation: The Science of Mechanics. La Salle: Open Court, 1960.
  • Makie, J. L. (1977), «Disposicions, Grounds and Causes», Synthese, 34, pp. 361-369.
  • Mackie, J. L. (1980), The Cement of Universe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • McKitrick, J. (2005), «Are Dispositions Causally Relevant?», Synthese ,144, pp. 357-371.
  • Mumford, S. (1998), Dispositions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mumford, S. (2011), «Dispositions», Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/dispositions/v-2.
  • Mumford, S. (2013), «The Power of Power», in: R. Groff and J. Greco (eds.) (2013), pp. 9-26.
  • Mumford, S. and Anjum, R. (1911,) Getting Causes from Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Popper, K. (1990), A World of Propensities, Bristol: Thoemmes.
  • Quine, W. V. O. (1974), Roots of Reference, La Salle, Ill.: Poner Court.
  • Russell, B. (1913), “On the Notion of Cause”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series 13, 1-26.
  • Wagensberg, J. (2006), A más cómo, menos por qué, Barcelona: Tusquets.