Youth Frustration and Intergenerational Conflict on Twitter

  1. Víctor Gago-Rivas 1
  2. Ángel Martín-Gómez 1
  3. Carmen García-Gutiérrez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Instituto de Estudios Socioeconómicos Aplicados. Spain
Revista:
Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Any de publicació: 2024

Títol de l'exemplar: Empowered and hyper(dis)connected audiences: Actors, contexts, experiences and educommunicative practices

Número: 78

Pàgines: 55-66

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.58262/V32I78.5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

Resum

In recent years, the generation has gained importance in the narrative of social change and conf lict, as ref lected in the spread of digital phenomena such as #OKBoomer, which highlighted the negative perception of this generation by later generations, popularising the term “boomer” as a pejorative adjective. In order to find out whether the use of this term is an expression of conf lict and generational vindication, we downloaded more than 600,000 tweets, in Spanish, issued between November 2019 and December 2022, which contained the term “the boomers”. Using supervised machine learning techniques, we quantified the percentage of tweets that, through the use of this term, expressed generational claims or conf licts. Subsequently, we used topic modelling techniques to investigate under which themes these are expressed. We found that, during this period, most of the tweets analysed expressed conf licts and demands, focusing on issues such as material and economic inequality, lack of opportunities to develop a life project and political issues. Everyday generational clashes were also observed, related to digital skills or attitudinal differences. In conclusion, behind the use of the term “boomer”, claims of the younger generations are being expressed in the form of generational conf lict, either by blaming the “boomer” generation for their situation or by denouncing the lack of empathy of the “boomer” generation towards them.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Aboim, S., & Vasconcelos, P. (2014). From Political to Social Generations: a Critical Reappraisal of Mannheim’s Classical Approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013509681
  • Anderson, M., & Keehn, G. (2020). Ok Boomer: Internet Memes as Consciousness Building. Radical Teacher, 118, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2020.746
  • Barrie, C., & Ho, J. C.-t. (2021). Academictwitter: an R Package to Access the Twitter Academic Research Product Track V2 Api Endpoint. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(62), 3272. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03272
  • Bengtson, V. L. (1975). Generation and Family Effects in Value Socialization. American Sociological Review, 40(3), 358-371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094463
  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3, 993-1022. https://go.revistacomunicar.com/7igrPz
  • Bristow, J. (2016). The Making of ‘boomergeddon’: the Construction of the Baby Boomer Generation as a Social Problem in Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(4), 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12206
  • Calderón, C. A., de la Vega, G., & Herrero, D. B. (2020). Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech Against Immigrants on Twitter Around the Emergence of a Far-right Party in Spain. Social Sciences, 9(11), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110188
  • Comisión Europea. (2021). Youth and Democracy in the European Year of Youth. Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/47iJrX8
  • Connolly, J. (2019). Generational Conf lict and the Sociology of Generations: Mannheim and Elias Reconsidered. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(7-8), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419827085
  • Díaz-Sarmiento, C., López-Lambraño, M., & Roncallo-Lafont, L. (2017). Entendiendo Las Generaciones: Una Revisión Del Concepto, Clasificación Y Características Distintivas De Los Baby Boomers, X Y Millennials. Clío América, 11(22), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897848.2440
  • Frey, K. T., & Bisconti, T. L. (2023). “Older, Entitled, and Extremely Out-of-Touch”: Does “OK, Boomer” Signify the Emergence of a New Older Adult Stereotype? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 42(6), 1200-1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231154044
  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of statistical software, 33(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01
  • García-Marín, J., & Serrano-Contreras, I.-J. (2023). (Un) Founded Fear Towards the Algorithm: Youtube Recommendations and Polarisation. Comunicar, 31(74), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-05
  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2002). The Third Age: Class, Cohort or Generation? Ageing & Society, 22(3), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0200870X
  • González-Ramírez, M. T., & Landero-Hernández, R. (2021). Diferencias en Tolerancia a La Frustración Entre Baby Boomers, Generación X Y Millennials. Ansiedad y Estrés, 27, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a12
  • Grün, B., & Hornik, K. (2022). Topicmodels: Topic Models. R package version 0.2-13. https://bit.ly/43SEbpU
  • Hvitfeldt, E., & Silge, J. (Eds.). (2021). Supervised Machine Learning for Text Analysis in R (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003093459.
  • INJUVE. (2020). Informe de la Juventud en España. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/43h9cE9
  • Jacobi, C., Van Atteveldt, W., & Welbers, K. (2016). Quantitative Analysis of Large Amounts of Journalistic Texts Using Topic Modelling. Digital journalism, 4(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271
  • Kelleher, J. D., Mac Namee, B., & D’Arcy, A. (2015). Fundamentals of machine learning for predictive data analytics: Algorithms, worked examples, and case studies. The MIT Press. https://go.revistacomunicar.com/g1JI7J
  • Kertzer, D. I. (1983). Generation as a Sociological Problem. Annual review of sociology, 9(1), 125 -149. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.0 01013
  • Lim, Y. J., & Lemanski, J. (2020). A Generational War is Launched With the Birth of Ok Boomer in the Digital Age. The Journal of Society and Media, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v4n1.p1-15
  • Mannheim, K. (Ed.). (2013). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315005058.
  • McCrindle, M., & Wolfinger, E. (2009). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the Global Generations. University of New South Wales Press. https://go.revistacomunicar.com/HnsBkX
  • Meisner, B. A. (2021). Are You Ok, Boomer? Intensification of Ageism and Intergenerational Tensions on Social Media Amid C ov id-19. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773983
  • Mueller, J. C., & McCollum, J. (2022). A Sociological Analysis of “ok Boomer”. Critical Sociology, 48(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.117 7/08969205211025724
  • Ng, R., & Indran, N. (2022). Hostility Toward Baby Boomers on Tiktok. The Gerontologist, 62(8), 1196-1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac020
  • Nikita, M., & Chaney, N. (2020). ldatuning: Tuning of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models Parameters. R package version 1.0.2. https://bit.ly/44Q36vF
  • Purhonen, S. (2016). Generations on Paper: Bourdieu and the Critique of ‘generationalism’. Social Science Information, 55(1), 9 4 -114 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415608967
  • Saucedo Soto, J. M., Hernández Bonilla, A., de la Peña de León, A., Amezcua Núñez, B., & López González, G. P. (2018). Baby Boomers Una Generación Puente (Baby Boomers: a Bridge Generation). Revista Internacional Administración & Finanzas,11(3), 47-56. https://bit.ly/3rVkh0n
  • Sunkara, B. (2019, November 6). Why it’s time to ditch the ‘OK Boomer’ meme. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/45oOt36
  • Swim, J. K., Aviste, R., Lengieza, M. L., & Fasano, C. J. (2022). Ok Boomer: a Decade of Generational Differences in Feelings About Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 73, 102479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102479
  • Thorpe, C., & Inglis, D. (2019). Do ‘global Generations’ Exist?: From Mannheim to Beck and Beyond. Youth and globalization, 1(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-00101003
  • Timonen, V., & Conlon, C. (2015). Beyond Mannheim: Conceptualising How People ‘talk’and ‘do’generations in Contemporary Society. Advances in life course research, 24, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.03.001
  • Twitter. (2022, 6 de octubre). Así Es La Gen Z en Twitter. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3OAT8bQ
  • Walker, A., & Naegele, G. (1999). The Politics of Old Age in Europe. Open University Press. https://go.revistacomunicar.com/Wx7xoQ
  • White, J. (2013). Thinking Generations. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 216-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12015
  • Willetts, D. (2010). The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Took Their Children’s Future-and Why They Should Give It Back. Atlantic Books. https://go.revistacomunicar.com/HeIKuc
  • Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021). ‘# Okboomer, Time to Meet the Zoomers’: Studying the Memefication of Intergenerational Politics on Tiktok. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2459-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet